FLNG
Price
$31.25
Change
-$0.07 (-0.22%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.67B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NAT
Price
$8.41
Change
+$0.24 (+2.94%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.65B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLNG vs NAT

FLNG vs NAT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLNG vs. NAT commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNG is a StrongBuy and NAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLNG vs NAT: Fundamental Ratings
FLNG
NAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8943
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
5938
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAT's Valuation (5) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FLNG (6) in the null industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FLNG (9) in the null industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's SMR Rating (38) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FLNG (59) in the null industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FLNG (43) in the null industry. This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NAT (98) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that FLNG’s stock grew significantly faster than NAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLNGNAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (FLNG: $31.32 vs. NAT: $8.17)
Brand notoriety: FLNG: Not notable vs. NAT: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLNG: 82% vs. NAT: 101%
Market capitalization -- FLNG: $1.67B vs. NAT: $1.65B
FLNG [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $1.67B. NAT’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $32.88K to $104.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $16.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLNG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while NAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLNG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLNG is a better buy in the long-term than NAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLNG is a better buy in the short-term than NAT.

Price Growth

FLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.80% price change this week, while NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +6.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2026.

NAT is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.25% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FLNG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POWL190.606.17
+3.35%
Powell Industries Inc.
GOGO2.170.02
+0.93%
Gogo
PAHC35.870.13
+0.36%
Phibro Animal Health Corp
ASML1808.49-3.18
-0.18%
ASML Holding NV
SPRU1.58-0.13
-7.60%
Spruce Power Holding Corp

FLNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLNG has been loosely correlated with NVGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLNG jumps, then NVGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLNG
1D Price
Change %
FLNG100%
+1.82%
NVGS - FLNG
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
NAT - FLNG
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
TK - FLNG
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
TNK - FLNG
51%
Loosely correlated
+4.07%
BWLP - FLNG
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.87%
More

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
+3.42%
FRO - NAT
76%
Closely correlated
+4.61%
INSW - NAT
74%
Closely correlated
+4.05%
TNK - NAT
74%
Closely correlated
+4.07%
DHT - NAT
73%
Closely correlated
+4.39%
ECO - NAT
73%
Closely correlated
+6.01%
More