It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLNG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNVGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVGS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -3.41% price change this week, while NVGS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -4.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -3.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.
FLNG is expected to report earnings on Feb 28, 2025.
NVGS is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
FLNG | NVGS | FLNG / NVGS | |
Capitalization | 1.34B | 1.12B | 119% |
EBITDA | 302M | 265M | 114% |
Gain YTD | -17.552 | 3.455 | -508% |
P/E Ratio | 11.57 | 14.04 | 82% |
Revenue | 371M | 551M | 67% |
Total Cash | 410M | 150M | 273% |
Total Debt | 1.81B | 857M | 211% |
FLNG | NVGS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLNG's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVGS (47) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that FLNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVGS’s over the last 12 months.
FLNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVGS (69) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that FLNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVGS’s over the last 12 months.
FLNG's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as NVGS (78) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that FLNG’s stock grew similarly to NVGS’s over the last 12 months.
NVGS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FLNG (81) in the null industry. This means that NVGS’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.
FLNG's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVGS (76) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that FLNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVGS’s over the last 12 months.
FLNG | NVGS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago73% | 10 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago67% | 3 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UIAGX | 71.49 | N/A | N/A |
Victory Aggressive Growth Institutional | |||
GFVRX | 15.87 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Focused Value R | |||
ODVYX | 39.33 | -0.06 | -0.15% |
Invesco Developing Markets Y | |||
QAMNX | 19.96 | -0.03 | -0.15% |
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | |||
FSBKX | 20.55 | -0.07 | -0.34% |
Federated Hermes Global Allocation R |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLNG has been loosely correlated with TK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLNG jumps, then TK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLNG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLNG | 100% | +0.19% | ||
TK - FLNG | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.94% | ||
INSW - FLNG | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
DHT - FLNG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
FRO - FLNG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
NVGS - FLNG | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVGS has been loosely correlated with INSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVGS jumps, then INSW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NVGS | 100% | -0.73% | ||
INSW - NVGS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
TNK - NVGS | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
STNG - NVGS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
TRMD - NVGS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
DHT - NVGS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More |