FLOT
Price
$50.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Net Assets
10.98B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICLO
Price
$25.57
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Net Assets
578.36M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLOT vs ICLO

FLOT vs ICLO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) vs. Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO)

Key Takeaways

  • FLOT is a passive ETF tracking an index of investment-grade floating rate notes with maturities under five years, while ICLO is an actively managed ETF focused on AAA-rated collateralized loan obligation (CLO) floating rate notes of any maturity.
  • Both ETFs target low-duration floating rate exposure to reduce interest rate sensitivity and generate income, but FLOT emphasizes broader corporate floating rate notes and ICLO concentrates on securitized AAA CLO tranches.
  • FLOT offers a lower expense ratio of 0.15% compared to ICLO’s 0.19%, with greater diversification through hundreds of holdings versus ICLO’s more concentrated portfolio.
  • Structural differences include FLOT’s index-based replication versus ICLO’s active security selection leveraging CLO expertise for credit quality and income optimization.
  • In the current environment of fluctuating interest rates, both provide defensive fixed-income exposure, with FLOT offering broader market beta and ICLO providing targeted high-quality securitized credit.
  • Liquidity profiles favor FLOT due to larger scale and longer track record, while ICLO appeals to investors seeking active management in the CLO segment.

Introduction

FLOT and ICLO represent two distinct approaches to floating rate fixed-income exposure within the ultrashort bond and securitized credit segments. They do not compete directly but offer complementary strategies for investors seeking income with limited interest rate risk. FLOT provides passive, index-driven access to corporate floating rate notes, whereas ICLO delivers active management in AAA-rated CLO floating rate notes. In the prevailing macroeconomic setting of evolving monetary policy and credit conditions, these ETFs help investors navigate duration risk while pursuing yield, making them relevant for portfolio construction focused on stability and income generation.

iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) Overview

The iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF seeks to track the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, which comprises U.S. dollar-denominated, investment-grade floating rate bonds with remaining maturities between one month and five years. The fund employs a passive strategy with physical replication and holds approximately 500 holdings. Top allocations typically include floating rate notes from major financial institutions and corporations. Sector exposure centers on financials and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As an open-ended fund from iShares (BlackRock), it features monthly distributions and maintains a focus on minimizing interest rate duration through floating rate mechanics.

Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) Overview

The Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF is an actively managed fund that invests at least 80% of its assets in floating rate note securities issued by collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) rated AAA or equivalent at purchase. It may hold securities of any maturity and employs a top-down macroeconomic and bottom-up fundamental approach. The portfolio contains around 150 holdings. The expense ratio is 0.19%. Launched by Invesco, the ETF targets current income and capital preservation with monthly distributions, emphasizing high credit quality within the securitized floating rate segment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The floating rate bond and CLO markets operate within the broader ultrashort fixed-income and securitized credit sectors. Key drivers include Federal Reserve interest rate expectations, credit spread dynamics, and corporate loan origination activity. Regulatory oversight of bank capital requirements and CLO structures influences supply and demand. Macro factors such as economic growth, inflation trends, and corporate earnings cycles affect credit quality and investor appetite for floating rate instruments. Risks encompass credit events in underlying loans, liquidity variations in securitized markets, and shifts in risk sentiment during periods of economic uncertainty.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited low volatility due to their floating rate structures, which adjust coupons with benchmark rates. FLOT’s broader index exposure has aligned closely with corporate floating rate note performance, benefiting from diversified holdings across issuers. ICLO’s active selection has emphasized AAA CLO tranches, potentially offering differentiated credit exposure and income stability. Relative positioning highlights FLOT’s scale and passive efficiency versus ICLO’s targeted securitized focus. During interest rate volatility or sector rotations, FLOT has provided consistent beta to the floating rate market, while ICLO has leveraged active management for credit selection within the CLO space.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and diversification profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability to FLOT. Its lower expense ratio, passive index tracking of a broad floating rate universe, and extensive holdings provide robust, scalable exposure with favorable risk characteristics in the prevailing environment. ICLO’s active approach and CLO focus offer complementary benefits but carry slightly higher costs and concentration considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FLOT vs. ICLO commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLOT is a Hold and ICLO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOTICLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
17%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
8%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
FLOT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMJL26.80N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL)
FIXD42.38N/A
-0.01%
First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD)
SEPM33.42N/A
-0.01%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - September (SEPM)
BLW11.81-0.03
-0.25%
Blackrock Limited
HEQ11.37-0.07
-0.61%
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund