Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWACX
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$44.22
Change+$0.28 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.07B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$35.48
Change+$0.26 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.32M
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWACX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Buy and HWACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. HWACX (722M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPKX (1.79) vs HWACX (0.34). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPKX (17 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.82). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPKX (23.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPKX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.91 vs. FLPKX (-3.10). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 65.26 vs. FLPKX (4.28).
| FLPKX | HWACX | FLPKX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.90 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.90 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.014 | 6.727 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 722M | 3,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.34 | 534% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | 3.91 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.47 | 20.98 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.28 | 65.26 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.58 | 36.82 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers