Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWACX
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$40.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.89B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$35.56
Change+$0.04 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets762.19M
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Hold and HWACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. HWACX (762M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPKX (1.95) vs HWACX (0.32). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPKX (18 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.79). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FLPKX (22.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPKX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.78 vs. FLPKX (-6.71). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.35 vs. FLPKX (-8.10).
| FLPKX | HWACX | FLPKX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.93 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.93 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.009 | 7.636 | -0% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.9B | 762M | 3,005% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 0.32 | 602% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.71 | -4.78 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.44 | 17.90 | -53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.10 | 41.35 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.52 | 43.00 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement