Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWACX
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$41.51
Change-$0.31 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$37.52
Change+$0.18 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets788.5M
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Buy and HWACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. HWACX (789M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPKX (1.92) vs HWACX (0.32). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPKX (17 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.82). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPKX (23.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPKX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. FLPKX (-3.30). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 68.23 vs. FLPKX (0.97).
| FLPKX | HWACX | FLPKX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.90 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.90 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.507 | 13.152 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 789M | 3,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.32 | 605% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.30 | 3.90 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.19 | 37.93 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.97 | 68.23 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.74 | 50.21 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement