FLQL vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQL is a StrongBuy and SNPS is a Sell.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FLQL | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 75% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GREUX | 13.11 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities R6 | |||
| RAFBX | 37.59 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
| American Funds AMCAP R2 | |||
| MCTRX | 21.07 | -0.06 | -0.28% |
| NYLI Income Builder Class C | |||
| DFSPX | 13.13 | -0.08 | -0.61% |
| DFA Intl Sustainability Core 1 | |||
| STSRX | 15.74 | -0.10 | -0.63% |
| American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr R6 | |||
FLQL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQL | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| LRCX - FLQL | 74% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| SNPS - FLQL | 72% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| CDNS - FLQL | 72% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KLAC - FLQL | 71% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| AMAT - FLQL | 71% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -0.91% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 87% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.90% | ||
| INTU - SNPS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||