FLQL vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQL is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FLQL | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 21 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADVDX | 4.31 | 0.03 | +0.70% |
| abrdn Dynamic Dividend Instl | |||
| AMRMX | 55.56 | 0.25 | +0.45% |
| American Funds American Mutual A | |||
| EPLMX | 21.02 | 0.09 | +0.43% |
| NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield SIMPLE Cl | |||
| VGSCX | 31.66 | N/A | N/A |
| Virtus Duff & Phelps Glb Rl Estt Secs C | |||
| MNCEX | 10.05 | N/A | N/A |
| Mercer Non-US Core Equity Y3 | |||
FLQL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQL | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| LRCX - FLQL | 74% Closely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| SNPS - FLQL | 72% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| CDNS - FLQL | 72% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| KLAC - FLQL | 71% Closely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| AMAT - FLQL | 71% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 85% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -7.90% | ||
| RIOT - SNPS | 53% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
More | ||||