Investors evaluating enterprise software stocks often weigh stability against transformative growth potential. BSY (Bentley Systems) and SNPS (Synopsys) represent two distinct flavors of engineering software leadership—one focused on infrastructure design and digital twin solutions, the other on electronic design automation (EDA) and silicon IP. While both companies operate in secular growth markets tied to global digitization and AI adoption, their recent trajectories have diverged meaningfully. This stock comparison examines how these two names stack up across recent performance, business fundamentals, risk profiles, and market positioning, offering context for traders and investors assessing the relative opportunity set.
Bentley Systems is a Pennsylvania-based provider of infrastructure engineering software, serving professionals who design, build, and operate roads, bridges, water systems, power grids, and communications networks. The company operates a predominantly subscription-based model, with subscriptions representing 92% of total revenues as of its most recent fiscal disclosures.
In recent weeks, BSY shares have traded in the $30–$33 range, near the lower end of a 52-week span of $28.08 to $59.25. The stock has meaningfully underperformed over the past year, declining roughly 44%, even as the underlying business continued to post healthy financial results. For full-year 2025, Bentley reported total revenues of $1.502 billion (up 11% year-over-year), with subscription revenue growing 12.5%. Free cash flow reached $520 million—up 24% year-over-year—and the company reduced its net debt leverage to 2.1x, a four-year low. Strategic acquisitions of Pointivo and Talon Aerolytics, closed in December 2025, strengthened the company's Asset Analytics portfolio, which applies digital twins and AI to infrastructure operations and maintenance. For 2026, management guided to constant-currency revenue growth of 11%–13% and free cash flow of $500–$570 million, signaling confidence in sustained demand across global infrastructure markets.
Synopsys, headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, is a dominant force in EDA—the specialized software used to design and verify semiconductor chips. The company also operates a large Design IP segment, providing pre-designed silicon components that accelerate chip development. In July 2025, Synopsys completed the landmark $34.9 billion acquisition of Ansys, a leader in engineering simulation software, dramatically expanding its total addressable market beyond traditional EDA.
The past several months have been eventful for SNPS. In September 2025, the company disclosed that its Design IP business had significantly underperformed expectations, with quarterly revenue of $1.740 billion missing prior guidance and Design IP revenue declining 7.7% year-over-year. Net income fell 43% compared to the prior-year quarter. The stock plummeted 35.8% in a single trading session—one of the sharpest one-day selloffs for a large-cap software name in recent memory—and several securities class action lawsuits were subsequently filed, alleging the company failed to disclose the extent to which AI-customer customization was deteriorating the economics of its IP business. On a positive note, full-year FY2025 revenue reached a record $7.05 billion (up 15%), backlog stood at $11.4 billion, and several Wall Street analysts upgraded the stock in the months following the selloff. The company also announced a 10% workforce reduction aimed at improving operational efficiency as it integrates Ansys, and suspended its share repurchase program to focus on deleveraging from the elevated post-acquisition debt load.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders a curated view into the platform's most compelling AI-powered trading tools. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers across various strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only a select few—those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics—earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ distinct trading styles ranging from short-term momentum plays to longer-duration trend-following approaches, with some reporting annualized returns that can reach into the double digits. Key performance metrics such as win rates, drawdowns, trade frequency, and Sharpe ratios vary across the bot roster, allowing users to match a bot's profile with their own risk tolerance and objectives. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page may help traders identify data-driven approaches suited to today's shifting market landscape.
From a business model perspective, BSY and SNPS serve adjacent but distinct ecosystems. Bentley's customer base spans civil engineering firms, government agencies, and infrastructure owner-operators—sectors characterized by long project cycles, regulatory tailwinds, and relatively predictable recurring revenue streams. Synopsys, by contrast, is tethered to semiconductor design cycles and chipmaker capital expenditure budgets, which carry higher cyclical sensitivity but also benefit from secular tailwinds like AI-driven chip demand.
Recent momentum clearly favors Bentley's operational steadiness. BSY posted consistent beats on margins and free cash flow through 2025, while SNPS endured a significant credibility shock linked to its IP segment. However, Synopsys's scale advantage is substantial—its post-Ansys revenue base is nearly five times larger than Bentley's—and its backlog of $11.4 billion provides considerable forward visibility. Risk profiles also diverge: BSY faces manageable debt (2.1x leverage) and generates ample free cash flow for dividends and buybacks, whereas SNPS carries elevated post-merger leverage and must execute a complex integration while managing ongoing litigation risk. On sentiment, both stocks have endured meaningful drawdowns from their highs, but SNPS has attracted analyst upgrades in recent months as the market reassesses the post-selloff valuation, while BSY's decline has been more gradual and appears tied to broader software-sector multiple compression rather than company-specific shocks.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, operational predictability, and relative financial stability, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely find BSY to be the more favorably positioned name in the current environment. Bentley's highly recurring subscription revenue base (92% of total), consistent ARR growth above 10%, expanding free cash flow, manageable leverage, and clear 2026 guidance all point to a steady compounding trajectory. Synopsys, while commanding a far larger market presence and a potentially transformative product portfolio following the Ansys acquisition, continues to navigate segment-level headwinds, integration complexity, and legal overhang that introduce higher uncertainty into near-term outcomes. The probability-weighted assessment suggests that Bentley's comparatively cleaner operating picture may offer a more stable foundation in the current market regime, though Synopsys's scale and post-correction valuation could appeal to investors with a higher tolerance for event-driven risk and a longer investment horizon.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BSY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BSY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BSY (@Packaged Software) experienced а +12.87% price change this week, while SNPS (@Computer Communications) price change was +4.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.33%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.23%.
BSY is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
SNPS is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (+0.92% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| BSY | SNPS | BSY / SNPS | |
| Capitalization | 10.8B | 74.4B | 15% |
| EBITDA | 444M | 2.91B | 15% |
| Gain YTD | -6.793 | -17.236 | 39% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.74 | 88.96 | 46% |
| Revenue | 1.56B | 8.68B | 18% |
| Total Cash | 105M | 2.48B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 1.17B | 10.8B | 11% |
BSY | SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BSY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPS (72) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BSY (100) in the null industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew similarly to BSY’s over the last 12 months.
BSY's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPS (87) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
BSY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPS (64) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BSY’s stock grew similarly to SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSY (93) in the null industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSY’s over the last 12 months.
| BSY | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 59% | 24 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 56% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSY has been closely correlated with ADSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSY jumps, then ADSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSY | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| ADSK - BSY | 70% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| COIN - BSY | 66% Loosely correlated | -10.59% | ||
| CRM - BSY | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| PTC - BSY | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| NOW - BSY | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +4.41% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| BSY - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.36% | ||
More | ||||