This comparison examines BSY and SNPS, two technology companies providing specialized software solutions. Bentley Systems delivers infrastructure engineering tools, while Synopsys supplies electronic design automation software used in semiconductor development. The analysis focuses on recent performance, business models, and market positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating relative opportunities in the software sector. Professionals monitoring technology infrastructure and semiconductor supply chains may find the side-by-side assessment particularly relevant for portfolio allocation decisions.
Bentley Systems, Incorporated develops software for infrastructure engineering projects, serving industries such as transportation, utilities, and construction. In recent weeks, the company released second-quarter 2026 financial results showing total revenue of $834.9 million, an increase of 13.6% year over year. The results reflected continued demand for digital twin and project delivery solutions. Stock performance during the period demonstrated resilience, with one-month gains exceeding 16% amid broader market stabilization. Sentiment has been supported by consistent recurring revenue and high gross margins, though the shares have trailed the S&P 500 on a year-to-date basis through mid-August 2026.
Synopsys, Inc. provides electronic design automation software essential for chip development and verification, with growing emphasis on artificial intelligence applications. Recent market activity included strong second-quarter fiscal 2026 results featuring revenue of $2.276 billion. The company benefits from sustained investment in semiconductor capacity and AI infrastructure. Through mid-August 2026, shares delivered approximately 15.3% year-to-date total return, outperforming the S&P 500. The stock has experienced volatility following earlier highs, partly influenced by valuation considerations ahead of the third-quarter earnings release scheduled for August 26, 2026. Overall positioning remains tied to long-term semiconductor design trends.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. The platform hosts hundreds of AI trading bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current trends and risk parameters earn placement in the trending section. Available bots display a wide range of statistics, including win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics that help users evaluate suitability. All the AI trading bots have different trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. Traders seeking data-driven signals may review the live listings for additional context on automated approaches.
The two companies differ markedly in scale and end-market exposure. SNPS maintains a substantially larger market capitalization and generates higher absolute revenue, reflecting its central role in semiconductor design automation. Growth drivers for SNPS center on artificial intelligence chip demand, whereas BSY draws from steady infrastructure project pipelines. Recent momentum has favored SNPS on a year-to-date basis, though BSY showed sharper short-term price appreciation in the most recent month. Risk factors include valuation compression for the higher-multiple SNPS and cyclical exposure to capital spending for both firms. Sector sentiment remains constructive for software providers tied to digital transformation, with SNPS positioned closer to AI tailwinds and BSY benefiting from more predictable infrastructure outlays.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in AI-related demand, relative revenue growth rates, and positioning ahead of upcoming catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term performance to SNPS. The company’s exposure to semiconductor design cycles and stronger year-to-date returns contribute to this assessment, though outcomes remain subject to earnings results and broader market conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| BSY | SNPS | BSY / SNPS | |
| Capitalization | 9.36B | 76.2B | 12% |
| EBITDA | 467M | 3.73B | 13% |
| Gain YTD | -18.549 | -15.401 | 120% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.42 | 69.35 | 50% |
| Revenue | 1.6B | 9.42B | 17% |
| Total Cash | 147M | 3.61B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 1.27B | 10.8B | 12% |
BSY | SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 28 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BSY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPS (70) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BSY (100) in the null industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew similarly to BSY’s over the last 12 months.
BSY's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPS (86) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BSY (64) in the null industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew similarly to BSY’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSY (92) in the null industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew significantly faster than BSY’s over the last 12 months.
| BSY | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 60% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BSY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SNPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BSY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BSY (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.13% price change this week, while SNPS (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.57%.
BSY is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
SNPS is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-3.13% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSY has been closely correlated with ADSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSY jumps, then ADSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSY | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| ADSK - BSY | 71% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| CRM - BSY | 66% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| COIN - BSY | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| APPF - BSY | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| PTC - BSY | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| BSY - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.80% | ||
More | ||||