FLR
Price
$42.40
Change
-$1.35 (-3.09%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.85B
35 days until earnings call
PWR
Price
$400.41
Change
-$2.46 (-0.61%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
59.66B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLR vs PWR

Header iconFLR vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts FLR vs PWRBanner chart's image
Fluor
Price$42.40
Change-$1.35 (-3.09%)
Volume$3.86M
Capitalization6.85B
Quanta Services
Price$400.41
Change-$2.46 (-0.61%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization59.66B
FLR vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLR vs. PWR commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a StrongBuy and PWR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FLR: $42.40 vs. PWR: $400.41)
Brand notoriety: FLR and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLR: 87% vs. PWR: 93%
Market capitalization -- FLR: $6.85B vs. PWR: $59.66B
FLR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $6.85B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $59.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FLR and PWR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than FLR.

Price Growth

FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +335.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLR is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.94% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($59.7B) has a higher market cap than FLR($6.86B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than FLR: PWR (62.08) vs FLR (1.75). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 26.813 vs. FLR (-14.031). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.37B vs. FLR (525M). FLR has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. PWR (509M). FLR has less debt than PWR: FLR (1.07B) vs PWR (5.11B). PWR has higher revenues than FLR: PWR (26.1B) vs FLR (16.3B).
FLRPWRFLR / PWR
Capitalization6.86B59.7B11%
EBITDA525M2.37B22%
Gain YTD-14.03126.813-52%
P/E Ratio1.7562.083%
Revenue16.3B26.1B62%
Total Cash2.27B509M446%
Total Debt1.07B5.11B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLR vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
FLR
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3911
SMR RATING
1..100
1358
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5511
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10036
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLR's Valuation (50) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (92). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (39). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's SMR Rating (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (58). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLR (55). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLR (100). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLRPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPXS3.930.06
+1.55%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Bear 3X ETF
GMUB50.76-0.05
-0.10%
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
DLN86.09-0.27
-0.31%
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
SIXS49.41-0.39
-0.79%
ETC 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
DIVD36.32-0.31
-0.85%
Altrius Global Dividend ETF

FLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLR
1D Price
Change %
FLR100%
-3.09%
MTZ - FLR
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
PWR - FLR
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
AGX - FLR
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
GLDD - FLR
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
PRIM - FLR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
-0.61%
MTZ - PWR
84%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
FIX - PWR
80%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
EME - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
STRL - PWR
76%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
PRIM - PWR
76%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
More