Advertisement
FLR vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fluor Corporation (FLR) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Quanta Services (PWR) has delivered consistently stronger financial momentum, with record full-year 2025 revenue of $28.5 billion and a record backlog of $44 billion, reflecting deep demand across electric grid modernization and power generation infrastructure.
- Fluor Corporation (FLR) is navigating a more complex recovery, working through legacy project cost overruns, a $643 million adverse legal ruling, and a 2025 stock decline of roughly 20%, though its $25.5 billion backlog and NuScale monetization offer meaningful catalysts.
- Both companies operate in the engineering and construction (E&C) sector but serve different mixes of end markets: Quanta skews heavily toward electric utility and grid infrastructure, while Fluor maintains a diversified global portfolio spanning energy, urban infrastructure, and government services.
- Valuation presents a stark contrast — FLR trades at a forward P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) near 13, while PWR commands a forward P/E ratio above 23, reflecting the market's premium for Quanta's more predictable growth trajectory.
- Sentiment and trend consistency favor PWR in the current environment, though FLR may appeal to value-oriented investors willing to accept near-term uncertainty in exchange for a lower entry price and multiple potential catalysts.
Introduction
Fluor Corporation and Quanta Services represent two distinct approaches to capitalizing on the global infrastructure and energy investment cycle. Both are major players in engineering and construction, yet their recent performance trajectories, market positioning, and investor narratives have diverged considerably. This stock comparison examines how FLR and PWR stack up across key dimensions — from revenue growth and backlog quality to risk factors and sector exposure — offering a clear, data-driven perspective for traders and investors evaluating relative performance in today's market.
FLR Overview and Recent Performance
Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, is a global engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) firm serving clients across energy, urban infrastructure, and government mission-support markets. The company operates through three primary segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions. In recent months, Fluor has been navigating a challenging operational environment. For full-year 2025, the company reported revenue of $15.5 billion and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $504 million. On a GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) basis, Fluor posted a net loss attributable to shareholders of $51 million, or ($0.31) per share, weighed down by a $643 million adverse ruling related to a completed Santos project in Australia and cost growth on legacy infrastructure projects.
Despite these headwinds, Fluor has shown resilience in several areas. The company ended 2025 with a backlog of $25.5 billion, 81% of which is reimbursable — a shift toward lower-risk contract structures that supports more predictable financial performance. New awards for the year totaled $12.0 billion, with management expressing growing confidence in capturing significant EPC awards through 2026 and 2027. Additionally, Fluor's ongoing monetization of its NuScale Power investment has generated substantial liquidity — $605 million in proceeds during 2025 and an additional $1.35 billion in early 2026 — with full monetization expected by mid-2026. The company has also aggressively returned capital to shareholders, repurchasing $754 million in shares in 2025 and targeting $1.4 billion in buybacks for 2026.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services, based in Houston, Texas, is a leading provider of specialized infrastructure solutions for the electric power, pipeline, industrial, and communications industries. Unlike Fluor's global EPC focus, Quanta's business is heavily concentrated on U.S. electric grid modernization, renewable energy infrastructure, and power generation solutions — areas experiencing secular demand tailwinds from data center expansion, manufacturing reshoring, and electrification trends. Quanta's 2025 performance was nothing short of exceptional. Full-year revenue reached $28.5 billion, representing 20% year-over-year growth, while adjusted diluted EPS (earnings per share) grew 20% to $10.75. Adjusted EBITDA climbed to $2.88 billion, and the company generated record operating cash flow of $2.23 billion.
Quanta's backlog reached an all-time high of $44 billion at year-end 2025, driven by accelerating demand in its Electric Infrastructure Solutions segment. The company's strategic moves in recent months have further strengthened its positioning, including the $1.35 billion acquisition of Dynamic Systems, a premier mechanical and process infrastructure provider serving the technology and semiconductor markets. Quanta was also selected by NiSource to design, procure, and construct generation and infrastructure capable of producing approximately 3 gigawatts of power for a large data center campus. These developments underscore a business that is operating from a position of strength, with multi-year visibility supported by structural demand trends rather than cyclical recovery hopes.
Trending AI Robots
For traders and investors seeking a technology-driven edge in evaluating stocks like FLR and PWR, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway to hundreds of AI-powered trading bots. These bots trade across thousands of tickers using diverse strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles — from swing trading and trend following to mean-reversion and pattern recognition. Only the best-performing and most market-relevant bots earn placement in this curated section. Some featured robots have demonstrated compelling track records with annualized returns in the double-digit to high-double-digit range, while others focus on capital preservation with lower volatility. Each bot comes with fully transparent performance statistics, including win rates, number of trades, drawdown data, and Sharpe ratios. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help market participants identify algorithmically driven trading approaches aligned with their goals.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The contrast between these two engineering and construction names is sharp and multifaceted. On the growth front, PWR has clearly outperformed — its 20% revenue expansion and record-setting quarterly results reflect a business riding powerful secular currents in grid modernization, renewable energy, and data center buildout. FLR, by comparison, saw revenue decline to $15.5 billion from $16.3 billion in 2024, and its GAAP earnings were dented by one-time charges and legacy project execution issues.
Backlog quality represents another key differentiator. While Fluor's $25.5 billion backlog is substantial and 81% reimbursable — a deliberate shift toward lower-risk contracting — Quanta's $44 billion backlog is not only larger but also concentrated in the high-growth electric infrastructure segment, which now accounts for the majority of its business. Quanta's backlog-to-revenue ratio suggests deeper forward visibility tied to multi-decade infrastructure investment cycles.
Risk profiles diverge as well. Fluor carries baggage from legacy fixed-price projects, the Santos legal ruling, and an August 2025 disclosure of cost overruns that triggered a 27% single-day stock decline and a shareholder class-action investigation. Quanta faces its own risks — including execution complexity in large EPC-style generation programs and potential timing variability in project flows — but these are mitigated by its craft-skilled self-perform model and a predominantly lower-risk services mix.
Valuation tells its own story. FLR trades at a forward P/E ratio of approximately 13, a clear discount that reflects the market's uncertainty about Fluor's near-term earnings recovery. PWR commands a forward P/E above 23 — a premium justified by its consistent double-digit growth, but one that leaves less room for error if execution falters.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, backlog momentum, revenue growth trajectory, and relative earnings stability, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor Quanta Services (PWR) in the current market environment. Quanta's record financial metrics, expanding backlog, and alignment with structural demand drivers — including grid modernization, electrification, and data center infrastructure — represent a cleaner and more consistent growth narrative. Fluor's improving backlog mix, NuScale monetization, and aggressive capital return strategy present a credible turnaround thesis, but the company's path to sustained earnings growth remains contingent on resolving legacy project issues and converting a strengthening pipeline of EPC awards into profitable backlog. In a probabilistic assessment, the AI would likely recognize Quanta as the stock with fewer variables needing to break favorably, though it would not dismiss Fluor's potential for mean reversion and catalyst-driven upside.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a Buy and PWR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +4.47% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -1.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-3.15% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| FLR | PWR | FLR / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 7.22B | 93.1B | 8% |
| EBITDA | -206M | 2.71B | -8% |
| Gain YTD | 30.457 | 47.055 | 65% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.61 | 85.09 | 28% |
| Revenue | 15.2B | 30.1B | 50% |
| Total Cash | 3.67B | 250M | 1,469% |
| Total Debt | 1.07B | 6.32B | 17% |
FLR | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLR's Valuation (67) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (87). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLR (42). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's SMR Rating (63) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (69). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (50). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (27). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
| FLR | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 64% | 11 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
FLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.