FLR
Price
$41.24
Change
+$1.25 (+3.13%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.67B
87 days until earnings call
SHIM
Price
$1.77
Change
+$0.05 (+2.91%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
61.2M
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLR vs SHIM

Header iconFLR vs SHIM Comparison
Open Charts FLR vs SHIMBanner chart's image
Fluor
Price$41.24
Change+$1.25 (+3.13%)
Volume$27.34K
Capitalization6.67B
Shimmick
Price$1.77
Change+$0.05 (+2.91%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization61.2M
FLR vs SHIM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLR vs. SHIM commentary
Aug 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a StrongBuy and SHIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLR: $39.99 vs. SHIM: $1.72)
Brand notoriety: FLR and SHIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLR: 170% vs. SHIM: 154%
Market capitalization -- FLR: $6.46B vs. SHIM: $60.67M
FLR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $6.46B. SHIM’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $60.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLR is a better buy in the long-term than SHIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHIM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHIM is a better buy in the short-term than FLR.

Price Growth

FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -28.88% price change this week, while SHIM (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -16.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +478.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLR is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

SHIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.39% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLR($6.67B) has a higher market cap than SHIM($61.2M). FLR YTD gains are higher at: -18.917 vs. SHIM (-33.591). FLR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 525M vs. SHIM (-82.44M). FLR has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. SHIM (16.3M). SHIM has less debt than FLR: SHIM (47.7M) vs FLR (1.07B). FLR has higher revenues than SHIM: FLR (16.3B) vs SHIM (482M).
FLRSHIMFLR / SHIM
Capitalization6.67B61.2M10,897%
EBITDA525M-82.44M-637%
Gain YTD-18.917-33.59156%
P/E Ratio1.71N/A-
Revenue16.3B482M3,382%
Total Cash2.27B16.3M13,933%
Total Debt1.07B47.7M2,243%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLR: Fundamental Ratings
FLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLRSHIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAFFX45.240.80
+1.80%
American Funds AMCAP 529F1
MNCEX12.36N/A
N/A
Mercer Non-US Core Equity Y3
DIECX43.67N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Core Equity C
RSNRX38.57N/A
N/A
Victory Global Energy Transition A
SMVZX12.40N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity R6

FLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLR
1D Price
Change %
FLR100%
-3.45%
MTZ - FLR
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
ACM - FLR
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
PWR - FLR
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
PRIM - FLR
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
GVA - FLR
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More

SHIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHIM and WLDN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHIM and WLDN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHIM
1D Price
Change %
SHIM100%
+2.99%
WLDN - SHIM
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.48%
IESC - SHIM
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
GVA - SHIM
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
FLR - SHIM
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
CDLR - SHIM
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More