FLR
Price
$41.26
Change
-$0.32 (-0.77%)
Updated
Jun 2, 04:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.85B
60 days until earnings call
STN
Price
$104.64
Change
+$1.70 (+1.65%)
Updated
Jun 2, 04:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.66B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLR vs STN

Header iconFLR vs STN Comparison
Open Charts FLR vs STNBanner chart's image
Fluor
Price$41.26
Change-$0.32 (-0.77%)
Volume$350
Capitalization6.85B
Stantec
Price$104.64
Change+$1.70 (+1.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization11.66B
FLR vs STN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLR vs. STN commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a StrongBuy and STN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FLR: $41.58 vs. STN: $102.94)
Brand notoriety: FLR and STN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLR: 84% vs. STN: 119%
Market capitalization -- FLR: $6.85B vs. STN: $11.66B
FLR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $6.85B. STN’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $11.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $6.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLR is a better buy in the long-term than STN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STN is a better buy in the short-term than FLR.

Price Growth

FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +1.32% price change this week, while STN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

STN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.78% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STN($11.7B) has a higher market cap than FLR($6.85B). STN has higher P/E ratio than FLR: STN (42.32) vs FLR (3.94). STN YTD gains are higher at: 31.217 vs. FLR (-15.693). STN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 902M vs. FLR (748M). FLR has more cash in the bank: 2.51B vs. STN (255M). FLR has less debt than STN: FLR (1.09B) vs STN (2.04B). FLR has higher revenues than STN: FLR (16.6B) vs STN (7.5B).
FLRSTNFLR / STN
Capitalization6.85B11.7B59%
EBITDA748M902M83%
Gain YTD-15.69331.217-50%
P/E Ratio3.9442.329%
Revenue16.6B7.5B221%
Total Cash2.51B255M985%
Total Debt1.09B2.04B53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLR vs STN: Fundamental Ratings
FLR
STN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
363
SMR RATING
1..100
1759
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLR's Valuation (34) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STN (91). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STN’s over the last 12 months.

STN's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLR (36). This means that STN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLR’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's SMR Rating (17) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STN (59). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STN’s over the last 12 months.

STN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (48). This means that STN’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.

STN's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLR (100). This means that STN’s stock grew significantly faster than FLR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLRSTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIV76.410.20
+0.26%
Vanguard Interm-Term Bond ETF
FDLO61.090.10
+0.16%
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
DGT146.550.07
+0.05%
SPDR® Global Dow ETF
ROSC40.80-0.04
-0.10%
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
SPFF8.74-0.03
-0.33%
Global X SuperIncome™ Preferred ETF

FLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLR
1D Price
Change %
FLR100%
-1.38%
MTZ - FLR
67%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
FIX - FLR
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
EME - FLR
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
STRL - FLR
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
GVA - FLR
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More

STN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STN has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STN jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STN
1D Price
Change %
STN100%
-0.65%
ACM - STN
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
FLR - STN
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
APG - STN
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
EME - STN
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
MTZ - STN
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More