Advertisement
ACM vs STN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? AECOM (ACM) vs. Stantec Inc. (STN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AECOM (ACM) and Stantec Inc. (STN) operate in the engineering and construction sector, with ACM showing larger scale at $15.96B TTM revenue versus STN's $6.49B.
- Recent market activity has pressured both stocks, with ACM down approximately 15% YTD and STN down about 7% YTD, amid broader sector volatility.
- ACM trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 17.83 compared to STN's 28.38, suggesting relative value in ACM.
- Both companies maintain solid balance sheets, but STN exhibits lower debt/equity at 78.60% versus ACM's 136.55%, indicating potentially lower financial risk.
- Analyst targets imply upside for both, with ACM averaging $121.75 and STN receiving multiple Buy ratings ahead of earnings.
- Sector tailwinds like infrastructure spending support growth, though recent sentiment reflects caution on execution risks.
Introduction
AECOM (ACM) and Stantec Inc. (STN) are prominent players in the engineering and construction industry, providing professional services for infrastructure, environmental, and facilities projects worldwide. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid ongoing infrastructure demand driven by government initiatives and sustainability trends. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors focused on long-term sector growth will find value in evaluating their relative valuation, financial health, and exposure to key growth drivers like data centers and clean energy. Both stocks have faced recent pressure but offer distinct profiles in a resilient sector.
AECOM Overview and Recent Performance
AECOM (ACM), headquartered in Dallas, is a global leader in infrastructure consulting, design, and engineering services across transportation, water, environment, and energy sectors. With 51,000 employees, it serves governments and private clients, reporting TTM revenue of $15.96 billion and net income of $601.34 million. The stock, trading around $80.59 with a market cap of $10.42 billion, has declined about 15% YTD and 24% over 52 weeks (range: $79.01-$135.52), reflecting broader market caution despite strong fundamentals like 28.16% return on equity (ROE) and 1.34% dividend yield.
In recent weeks, sentiment has been influenced by upcoming Q2 FY26 earnings on May 11, 2026, expectations of EPS growth, and wins like a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers environmental contract. Data center infrastructure opportunities and analyst Buy ratings (average target $121.75) have provided support, though price target adjustments signal near-term volatility. Trading at a trailing P/E of 17.83 (forward 13.39), ACM appears attractively valued relative to peers, buoyed by EBITDA of $1.26 billion TTM.
Stantec Inc. Overview and Recent Performance
Stantec Inc. (STN), based in Edmonton, Canada, delivers sustainable engineering, architecture, and environmental consulting services internationally. It reported TTM revenue of $6.49 billion and net income of $479.4 million, with a focus on infrastructure and facilities for public and private sectors. The stock, at $87.41 with a $9.98 billion market cap, is down roughly 7% YTD and 6.5% over 52 weeks (range: $84.08-$114.52), amid sector headwinds but supported by lower beta of 0.72.
Recent market activity highlights its 19th annual Sustainability Report, noting 68% ($5.5 billion CAD) of revenue from sustainability-driven projects, alongside analyst upgrades to Strong Buy and Buy ratings ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on May 13. With 15.50% ROE, 0.99% dividend yield, and EBITDA of $947.9 million TTM, STN benefits from a cleaner balance sheet (debt/equity 78.60%). Its trailing P/E of 28.38 reflects premium growth expectations, tempered by recent share price weakness.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes. These bots, optimized for current market conditions, showcase impressive stats including annualized returns up to +285.35%, win rates ranging from 50.96% to 88.33%, profit factors to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 19. They employ varied approaches like trend following, TP/SL corridors (e.g., 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss), multi-agent systems, and sector focuses such as semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and ETFs, with trade durations from 1 day to 46 days and tickers per bot from 1 to 18. Ideal for copy trading, these tools help navigate volatility. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your risk profile and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AECOM (ACM) and Stantec Inc. (STN) share engineering and construction sector exposure but differ in scale and focus. ACM’s larger revenue base ($15.96B TTM) and higher EBITDA ($1.26B) support broader infrastructure plays like transportation and data centers, while STN emphasizes sustainability (68% revenue) in environmental and facilities projects. Growth drivers include public spending for ACM and ESG trends for STN.
Recent momentum favors neither decisively, with both down YTD but STN less volatile (beta 0.72 vs. 1.00). Risk factors: ACM’s higher debt/equity (136.55%) versus STN’s 78.60%; ACM offers superior ROE (28.16% vs. 15.50%). Market sentiment leans positive for both pre-earnings, with ACM’s lower P/E (17.83 vs. 28.38) highlighting value, while STN trades at a growth premium. Trade-offs balance ACM’s efficiency against STN’s stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI analysis would currently lean toward AECOM (ACM) due to its superior trend consistency in revenue scale, higher ROE, attractive forward P/E of 13.39, and catalysts like data center demand and recent contract wins. While STN offers lower risk via reduced leverage and sustainability positioning, ACM’s relative undervaluation and stability in recent market activity suggest higher probability of outperformance, particularly post-earnings if growth expectations hold.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACM is a StrongBuy and STN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ACM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- STN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACM (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -2.49% price change this week, while STN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -3.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACM is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
STN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-0.41% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| ACM | STN | ACM / STN | |
| Capitalization | 8.72B | 7.82B | 112% |
| EBITDA | 1.3B | 1.13B | 114% |
| Gain YTD | -28.332 | -27.406 | 103% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.17 | 22.62 | 63% |
| Revenue | 16B | 8.29B | 193% |
| Total Cash | 1.03B | 374M | 276% |
| Total Debt | 3.22B | 2.59B | 124% |
ACM | STN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACM's Valuation (30) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STN (42). This means that ACM’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
STN's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACM (92). This means that STN’s stock grew similarly to ACM’s over the last 12 months.
ACM's SMR Rating (43) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STN (56). This means that ACM’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
ACM's Price Growth Rating (77) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STN (80). This means that ACM’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
ACM's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STN (91). This means that ACM’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
| ACM | STN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 54% | 12 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 39% |
Advertisement
ACM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACM has been loosely correlated with J. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACM jumps, then J could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACM | 100% | -1.38% | ||
| J - ACM | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| STN - ACM | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| TTEK - ACM | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| EXPO - ACM | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| KBR - ACM | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||
STN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STN has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STN jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STN | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| ACM - STN | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| J - STN | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| TTEK - STN | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| EXPO - STN | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| PRIM - STN | 35% Loosely correlated | +6.95% | ||
More | ||||