FLUT
Price
$231.14
Change
+$3.64 (+1.60%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.34B
70 days until earnings call
INSE
Price
$8.25
Change
-$0.27 (-3.17%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
261.4M
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLUT vs INSE

Header iconFLUT vs INSE Comparison
Open Charts FLUT vs INSEBanner chart's image
Flutter Entertainment
Price$231.14
Change+$3.64 (+1.60%)
Volume$22.66K
Capitalization35.34B
Inspired Entertainment
Price$8.25
Change-$0.27 (-3.17%)
Volume$3.05K
Capitalization261.4M
FLUT vs INSE Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLUT vs. INSE commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUT is a StrongBuy and INSE is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FLUT: $227.50 vs. INSE: $8.52)
Brand notoriety: FLUT and INSE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLUT: 360% vs. INSE: 115%
Market capitalization -- FLUT: $35.34B vs. INSE: $261.4M
FLUT [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $35.34B. INSE’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $261.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINSE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • INSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FLUT and INSE are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLUT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLUT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • INSE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INSE is a better buy in the short-term than FLUT.

Price Growth

FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -16.11% price change this week, while INSE (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -15.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +71.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLUT is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

INSE is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-1.33% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLUT($35.3B) has a higher market cap than INSE($261M). INSE YTD gains are higher at: -5.801 vs. FLUT (-11.975). FLUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. INSE (89.7M). FLUT has higher revenues than INSE: FLUT (9.11B) vs INSE (300M).
FLUTINSEFLUT / INSE
Capitalization35.3B261M13,525%
EBITDA1.27B89.7M1,417%
Gain YTD-11.975-5.801206%
P/E RatioN/A22.16-
Revenue9.11B300M3,038%
Total CashN/A42.1M-
Total DebtN/A304M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLUT vs INSE: Fundamental Ratings
FLUT
INSE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6585
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3969
SMR RATING
1..100
88100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8192
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
673
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

INSE's Valuation (67) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as FLUT (98) in the null industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as INSE (69) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to INSE’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as INSE (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to INSE’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as INSE (92) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to INSE’s over the last 12 months.

INSE's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLUT (67) in the null industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLUTINSE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCTK0.380.01
+4.07%
GlucoTrack Inc
IVA3.140.03
+0.96%
Inventiva SA
MAA167.340.98
+0.59%
Mid-America Apartment Communities
SXT73.390.40
+0.55%
Sensient Technology Corp
EFXT6.91-0.28
-3.89%
Enerflex Ltd

FLUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been loosely correlated with DKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then DKNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLUT
1D Price
Change %
FLUT100%
-8.36%
DKNG - FLUT
51%
Loosely correlated
-5.51%
GMVHY - FLUT
43%
Loosely correlated
-11.02%
PENN - FLUT
35%
Loosely correlated
-9.46%
BYD - FLUT
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
CDRO - FLUT
31%
Poorly correlated
-7.76%
More

INSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSE has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INSE jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INSE
1D Price
Change %
INSE100%
-6.42%
CZR - INSE
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.28%
GDEN - INSE
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
MGM - INSE
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
PENN - INSE
39%
Loosely correlated
-9.46%
CHDN - INSE
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
More