FLUT
Price
$220.72
Change
-$8.73 (-3.80%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.34B
47 days until earnings call
MGM
Price
$28.47
Change
-$2.28 (-7.41%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.97B
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLUT vs MGM

Header iconFLUT vs MGM Comparison
Open Charts FLUT vs MGMBanner chart's image
Flutter Entertainment
Price$220.72
Change-$8.73 (-3.80%)
Volume$912
Capitalization35.34B
MGM Resorts International
Price$28.47
Change-$2.28 (-7.41%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization14.97B
FLUT vs MGM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLUT vs. MGM commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUT is a Hold and MGM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FLUT: $229.45 vs. MGM: $30.75)
Brand notoriety: FLUT: Not notable vs. MGM: Notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLUT: 79% vs. MGM: 92%
Market capitalization -- FLUT: $35.34B vs. MGM: $14.97B
FLUT [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $35.34B. MGM’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $14.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMGM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MGM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGM is a better buy in the long-term than FLUT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLUT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLUT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MGM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FLUT and MGM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while MGM (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLUT is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

MGM is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-2.17% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLUT($35.3B) has a higher market cap than MGM($15B). FLUT (-11.221) and MGM (-11.255) have similar YTD gains . MGM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.75B vs. FLUT (1.27B). MGM has higher revenues than FLUT: MGM (16.2B) vs FLUT (9.11B).
FLUTMGMFLUT / MGM
Capitalization35.3B15B235%
EBITDA1.27B2.75B46%
Gain YTD-11.221-11.255100%
P/E RatioN/A14.98-
Revenue9.11B16.2B56%
Total CashN/A2.93B-
Total DebtN/A31.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLUT vs MGM: Fundamental Ratings
FLUT
MGM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1258
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4455
SMR RATING
1..100
9042
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6562
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGM's Valuation (75) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (97) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MGM (55) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to MGM’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's SMR Rating (42) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLUT (90) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as MGM (64) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to MGM’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (65) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLUTMGM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAYD33.280.77
+2.35%
Taylor Devices
NWS30.550.27
+0.89%
News Corp
TFPM19.440.16
+0.83%
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
CNET1.46-0.02
-1.35%
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc
HAIN4.05-0.11
-2.64%
Hain Celestial Group

FLUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been loosely correlated with DKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then DKNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLUT
1D Price
Change %
FLUT100%
+2.98%
DKNG - FLUT
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.74%
GMVHY - FLUT
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
PENN - FLUT
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.38%
BYD - FLUT
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.85%
MGM - FLUT
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More

MGM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGM has been closely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGM jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGM
1D Price
Change %
MGM100%
+2.71%
CZR - MGM
69%
Closely correlated
+5.80%
BYD - MGM
69%
Closely correlated
+2.85%
WYNN - MGM
67%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
LVS - MGM
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
PENN - MGM
56%
Loosely correlated
+6.38%
More