FLUT
Price
$231.82
Change
+$4.22 (+1.85%)
Updated
Apr 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.34B
26 days until earnings call
PENN
Price
$15.18
Change
+$0.19 (+1.27%)
Updated
Apr 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.79B
14 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLUT vs PENN

Header iconFLUT vs PENN Comparison
Open Charts FLUT vs PENNBanner chart's image
Flutter Entertainment
Price$231.82
Change+$4.22 (+1.85%)
Volume$6.32K
Capitalization35.34B
PENN Entertainment
Price$15.18
Change+$0.19 (+1.27%)
Volume$61.98K
Capitalization2.79B
FLUT vs PENN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PENN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLUT vs. PENN commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUT is a StrongBuy and PENN is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (FLUT: $231.91 vs. PENN: $15.20)
Brand notoriety: FLUT and PENN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLUT: 57% vs. PENN: 89%
Market capitalization -- FLUT: $35.34B vs. PENN: $2.79B
FLUT [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $35.34B. PENN’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $2.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePENN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PENN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLUT is a better buy in the long-term than PENN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLUT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PENN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLUT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PENN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PENN is a better buy in the short-term than FLUT.

Price Growth

FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while PENN (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +6.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLUT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

PENN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+1.34% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLUT($35.3B) has a higher market cap than PENN($2.79B). FLUT YTD gains are higher at: -11.937 vs. PENN (-24.369). FLUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. PENN (400M). FLUT has higher revenues than PENN: FLUT (9.11B) vs PENN (6.36B).
FLUTPENNFLUT / PENN
Capitalization35.3B2.79B1,267%
EBITDA1.27B400M318%
Gain YTD-11.937-24.36949%
P/E RatioN/A4.47-
Revenue9.11B6.36B143%
Total CashN/A1.07B-
Total DebtN/A11.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLUT vs PENN: Fundamental Ratings
FLUT
PENN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2054
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3897
SMR RATING
1..100
9091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5885
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PENN's Valuation (64) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLUT (98) in the null industry. This means that PENN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PENN (97) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as PENN (91) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to PENN’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as PENN (85) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to PENN’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PENN (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLUTPENN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PENN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWIFX61.331.16
+1.93%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R5
CPCLX15.050.13
+0.87%
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
LOMAX14.22N/A
N/A
Edgar Lomax Value
WOOOX14.20N/A
N/A
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity R3
FZACX31.98N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z

FLUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been loosely correlated with DKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then DKNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLUT
1D Price
Change %
FLUT100%
+2.75%
DKNG - FLUT
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
PENN - FLUT
47%
Loosely correlated
+8.39%
BYD - FLUT
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.22%
INSE - FLUT
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
CZR - FLUT
44%
Loosely correlated
+7.00%
More

PENN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PENN has been closely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PENN jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PENN
1D Price
Change %
PENN100%
+8.39%
BYD - PENN
70%
Closely correlated
+3.22%
CZR - PENN
69%
Closely correlated
+7.00%
MGM - PENN
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
GDEN - PENN
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.70%
RRR - PENN
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
More