FLWS vs RH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Hold and RH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLWS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLWS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -9.36% price change this week, while RH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -10.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLWS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
RH is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-0.50% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| FLWS | RH | FLWS / RH | |
| Capitalization | 699M | 6.38B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 1.43M | 524M | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -33.488 | 36.634 | -91% |
| P/E Ratio | 156.25 | 56.64 | 276% |
| Revenue | 1.91B | 3.03B | 63% |
| Total Cash | 312M | 124M | 252% |
| Total Debt | 318M | 3.72B | 9% |
FLWS | RH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RH's Valuation (91) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (94) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
RH's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
RH's SMR Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (89) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
RH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (78) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as RH (3) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
| FLWS | RH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 85% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IGF | 51.88 | 0.68 | +1.33% |
| iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | |||
| ALTL | 37.45 | 0.38 | +1.03% |
| Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | |||
| ESMV | 28.00 | 0.24 | +0.86% |
| iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | |||
| PFIG | 23.59 | 0.11 | +0.47% |
| Invesco Fdmtl Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
| XBIL | 50.15 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF | |||
FLWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLWS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ABG - FLWS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| PAG - FLWS | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| RH - FLWS | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| CPRT - FLWS | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CARS - FLWS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||