GABC($1.87B) has a higher market cap than FMAO($489M). GABC has higher P/E ratio than FMAO: GABC (13.10) vs FMAO (12.21). FMAO YTD gains are higher at: 45.891 vs. GABC (29.578). GABC has less debt than FMAO: GABC (139M) vs FMAO (203M). GABC has higher revenues than FMAO: GABC (386M) vs FMAO (126M).

	FMAO	GABC	FMAO / GABC
Capitalization	489M	1.87B	26%
EBITDA	N/A	N/A	-
Gain YTD	45.891	29.578	155%
P/E Ratio	12.21	13.10	93%
Revenue	126M	386M	33%
Total Cash	152M	N/A	-
Total Debt	203M	139M	146%

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

FMAO vs GABC: Fundamental Ratings

	FMAO	GABC
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100	36	88
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100	47 Fair valued	64 Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100	55	44
SMR RATING 1..100	40	20
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100	38	44
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100	39	60
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100	50	n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMAO's Valuation (47) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as GABC (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FMAO’s stock grew similarly to GABC’s over the last 12 months.

GABC's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMAO (55) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that GABC’s stock grew similarly to FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

GABC's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMAO (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that GABC’s stock grew similarly to FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

FMAO's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as GABC (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FMAO’s stock grew similarly to GABC’s over the last 12 months.

FMAO's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as GABC (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FMAO’s stock grew similarly to GABC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

	FMAO	GABC
RSI ODDS (%)	N/A	5 days ago 56%
Stochastic ODDS (%)	2 days ago 60%	2 days ago 64%
Momentum ODDS (%)	2 days ago 79%	2 days ago 69%
MACD ODDS (%)	2 days ago 73%	3 days ago 52%
TrendWeek ODDS (%)	2 days ago 74%	2 days ago 59%
TrendMonth ODDS (%)	2 days ago 78%	2 days ago 49%
Advances ODDS (%)	2 days ago 74%	2 days ago 57%
Declines ODDS (%)	12 days ago 64%	4 days ago 59%
BollingerBands ODDS (%)	2 days ago 67%	2 days ago 85%
Aroon ODDS (%)	N/A	2 days ago 41%

COMPARISON

Comparison

Sep 12, 2026

Stock price -- (FMAO: $35.47 vs. GABC: $49.75)

Brand notoriety: FMAO and GABC are both not notable

Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMAO: 46% vs. GABC: 66%

Market capitalization -- FMAO: $489.36M vs. GABC: $1.87B

FMAO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $489.36M. GABC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $10.73K to $142.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMAO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while GABC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

FMAO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
GABC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

According to our system of comparison, FMAO is a better buy in the long-term than GABC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMAO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GABC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

FMAO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
GABC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

According to our system of comparison, GABC is a better buy in the short-term than FMAO.

Price Growth

FMAO (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.57% price change this week, while GABC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMAO is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

GABC is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three

FMAO

Daily Signal:

Gain/Loss:

GABC

Setup

Daily Signal:

Description

Gain/Loss:

VIEW DETAILS VIEW DETAILS

VIEW FOR FREE VIEW FOR FREE

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

ETFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
QUBX	6.43	0.26	+4.21%
Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF
XQQI	48.60	0.68	+1.42%
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
KLIP	22.25	0.08	+0.36%
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strat ETF
PLTY	33.92	0.07	+0.21%
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
RDIV	61.14	0.11	+0.18%
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF

FMAO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAO has been closely correlated with GABC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAO jumps, then GABC could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To FMAO	1D Price Change %
FMAO	100%	+0.17%
GABC - FMAO	74% Closely correlated	+0.10%
CAC - FMAO	74% Closely correlated	+0.31%
CCNE - FMAO	74% Closely correlated	+0.03%
PRK - FMAO	74% Closely correlated	-0.17%
HBT - FMAO	73% Closely correlated	+0.61%
More

GABC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GABC has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GABC jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To GABC	1D Price Change %
GABC	100%	+0.10%
BY - GABC	86% Closely correlated	+0.76%
FRME - GABC	85% Closely correlated	+0.02%
SRCE - GABC	85% Closely correlated	+0.54%
THFF - GABC	84% Closely correlated	+0.05%
BUSE - GABC	84% Closely correlated	+0.20%
More