FMAO
Price
$30.08
Change
+$0.26 (+0.87%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
413.87M
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$57.42
Change
+$0.40 (+0.70%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
992.93M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMAO vs MBWM

FMAO vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMAO vs. MBWM commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAO is a Buy and MBWM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FMAO: $30.08 vs. MBWM: $57.42)
Brand notoriety: FMAO and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMAO: 39% vs. MBWM: 31%
Market capitalization -- FMAO: $413.87M vs. MBWM: $992.93M
FMAO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $413.87M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $992.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMAO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMAO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FMAO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMAO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMAO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FMAO and MBWM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FMAO (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMAO is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($993M) has a higher market cap than FMAO($414M). FMAO has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: FMAO (11.47) vs MBWM (10.30). FMAO YTD gains are higher at: 23.721 vs. MBWM (21.178). FMAO has more cash in the bank: 152M vs. MBWM (48.4M). FMAO has less debt than MBWM: FMAO (254M) vs MBWM (484M). MBWM has higher revenues than FMAO: MBWM (253M) vs FMAO (122M).
FMAOMBWMFMAO / MBWM
Capitalization414M993M42%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.72121.178112%
P/E Ratio11.4710.30111%
Revenue122M253M48%
Total Cash152M48.4M314%
Total Debt254M484M52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMAO vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
FMAO
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4242
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6716
SMR RATING
1..100
6346
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6251
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMAO's Valuation (28) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MBWM (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FMAO’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMAO (67) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMAO (63) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

FMAO's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MBWM (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FMAO’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMAO (62) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMAOMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMAO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VHCIX151.83N/A
N/A
Vanguard Health Care Index Admiral
ASRIX8.94N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Real Estate Income R5
QUASX80.87N/A
N/A
AB Small Cap Growth A
HOMPX17.49N/A
N/A
HW Opportunities MP
AFDVX26.92-0.09
-0.33%
Applied Finance Explorer Investor

FMAO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAO has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAO jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMAO
1D Price
Change %
FMAO100%
+0.87%
MCBS - FMAO
75%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
GABC - FMAO
75%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
FMBH - FMAO
74%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
MBWM - FMAO
74%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
HBT - FMAO
74%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
More