Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAT vs GNR
FMAT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts FMAT vs GNR
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF
Price$49.63
Change-$0.16 (-0.32%)
Volume$40.02K
Net Assets423.16M
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$53.26
Change+$0.19 (+0.36%)
Volume$105.52K
Net Assets2.75B
FMAT vs GNR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAT vs. GNR commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAT is a Buy and GNR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.75B vs. FMAT (423M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than FMAT: GNR (8.579) vs FMAT (3.452). FMAT was incepted earlier than GNR: FMAT (12 years) vs GNR (15 years). FMAT (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than GNR (0.40). GNR has a higher turnover FMAT (9.00) vs FMAT (9.00).
| FMAT | GNR | FMAT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 3.452 | 8.579 | 40% |
| Net Assets | 423M | 2.75B | 15% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.40 | 21% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 15.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 1.68 | 4.44 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMAT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAT has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAT jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| AVNT - FMAT | 84% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CE - FMAT | 83% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| LIN - FMAT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| EMN - FMAT | 77% Closely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| CRH - FMAT | 75% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y