Regional and community banks occupy a distinct niche in the financial sector, offering investors exposure to Main Street lending activity, deposit franchise value, and interest rate sensitivity. FMBH (First Mid Bancshares, Inc.) and PKBK (Parke Bancorp, Inc.) represent two such institutions — both well-established, profitable, and shareholder-focused — yet they differ markedly in scale, business mix, geographic footprint, and risk profile. For traders and investors evaluating relative performance in the current market environment, understanding how these two names compare across fundamentals, momentum, and forward-looking positioning is essential. This comparison examines both stocks through a data-driven lens, highlighting where each excels and where trade-offs exist.
First Mid Bancshares, headquartered in Mattoon, Illinois, is a financial holding company with roots stretching back over 160 years. Through its subsidiaries — First Mid Bank & Trust, First Mid Insurance Group, and First Mid Wealth Management — the company delivers banking, wealth management, brokerage, agricultural services, and insurance solutions primarily across Illinois, Missouri, and Texas. This multi-line revenue model differentiates FMBH from single-focus community lenders.
In recent quarters, FMBH has posted record-breaking results. The company reported its highest-ever quarterly net income of $23.4 million, or $0.98 diluted earnings per share (EPS), alongside an expanding net interest margin (NIM) that reached 3.72% — marking five consecutive quarters of NII (net interest income) growth. Total loans reached $5.77 billion and deposits stood at $6.19 billion, reflecting steady organic growth. Asset quality remains solid, with non-performing loans at just 0.38% of total loans and an allowance for credit losses (ACL) covering non-performing loans by 325%. The company's capital position is robust, with a Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio — a key measure of a bank's core equity capital relative to risk-weighted assets — of 12.92%. Analysts have taken note: Piper Sandler recently raised its price target on FMBH to $62.50 while maintaining an Overweight rating, citing above-average EPS growth and profitability supported by diversified fee-based businesses. A leadership transition is also underway, with Matthew K. Smith assuming the role of CEO in mid-2026, adding a layer of forward-looking change to the company's narrative.
Parke Bancorp, based in Washington Township, New Jersey, is the parent company of Parke Bank, a community-focused institution serving the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area. Unlike FMBH's diversified model, PKBK concentrates heavily on commercial real estate (CRE) lending, construction financing, and commercial and industrial (C&I) loans. The bank also maintains a notable — though declining — deposit relationship with cannabis-related businesses, which introduces a unique regulatory and reputational dimension to its risk profile.
PKBK's recent financial trajectory has been strong. In its latest quarterly report, the company posted net income of $8.3 million, a 28.3% increase year-over-year, with diluted EPS of $0.69. For the full fiscal year, PKBK delivered net income of $37.8 million, or $3.16 per diluted share, representing a 37.3% year-over-year jump. The bank's efficiency ratio — a measure of non-interest expense relative to revenue — improved to approximately 36%, an exceptionally lean figure that underscores disciplined cost management. Loan growth has been steady, with total loans reaching $2.04 billion in the most recent reporting period. However, credit quality presents a more nuanced picture. While non-performing loans remain manageable at 0.53% of total loans, past-due loans in the 30-to-89-day category spiked significantly — driven largely by a single large commercial borrower — which warrants continued monitoring. On the positive side, PKBK's allowance for credit losses covers non-performing loans by 321%, and the bank has strengthened its balance sheet by repaying $30 million in subordinated debt. CEO Vito Pantilione has also been actively purchasing shares in the open market, signaling management confidence.
In an increasingly data-driven market, traders are turning to artificial intelligence for an analytical edge. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's best-performing AI trading bots, drawn from a universe of hundreds that collectively trade thousands of tickers. Only those strategies demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this section. The bots span diverse trading styles — including swing trading, trend following, and high-frequency intraday approaches — with timeframes ranging from 5-minute to daily charts. Performance metrics vary widely, but top-performing bots have posted annualized returns ranging from approximately 78% to over 290%, with Sharpe ratios and drawdown statistics available for each strategy. Every bot features its own set of traded tickers, entry and exit logic, and risk parameters, allowing users to find approaches suited to their individual goals. Explore the full range of AI-powered strategies by visiting the Trending AI Robots page.
When comparing FMBH and PKBK, several contrasts emerge. Scale and diversification represent the most obvious divergence. FMBH's $5.77 billion loan portfolio and multi-state, multi-line business model — spanning banking, wealth management, insurance, and agricultural services — provide revenue resilience that a concentrated CRE lender like PKBK cannot match. PKBK's strength lies in its operational efficiency and focused lending strategy, but this same concentration in commercial real estate and construction lending represents a magnified risk in an environment where tariffs and elevated material costs pressure property development.
Profitability and efficiency present a mixed picture. PKBK's efficiency ratio of approximately 36% substantially outperforms FMBH's roughly 58%, reflecting tighter cost control at the smaller institution. However, FMBH's absolute net income dwarfs PKBK's, and its NIM expansion trajectory — reaching 3.72% — signals improving core profitability. Asset quality favors FMBH, with a non-performing loan ratio of 0.38% versus PKBK's 0.53%, and far fewer past-due loan concerns. Valuation tilts in PKBK's direction: the stock trades at a notably lower price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple, suggesting potential undervaluation relative to peers. Insider activity also diverges, with PKBK's CEO buying shares while a prominent director has been a consistent seller, whereas FMBH's insider transactions have been comparatively balanced.
Based on observable trend consistency, revenue diversification, asset quality metrics, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely express a probabilistic preference for FMBH in the current environment. The stock's expanding net interest margin, five-quarter streak of NII growth, diversified fee-based revenue streams, and stronger institutional analyst endorsement contribute to a more stable momentum profile. While PKBK offers compelling value on a P/E basis and has demonstrated strong earnings acceleration, the combination of concentrated CRE exposure, a notable past-due loan spike, and limited revenue diversification introduces a higher degree of uncertainty into its risk-adjusted outlook. Neither stock is without merit, and both serve different portfolio objectives, but the AI's pattern-recognition framework leans toward the steadier, broader-based growth trajectory that FMBH currently exhibits.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePKBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMBH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PKBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while PKBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.13%.
FMBH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FMBH | PKBK | FMBH / PKBK | |
| Capitalization | 1.36B | 403M | 338% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.647 | 39.535 | 83% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.69 | 8.92 | 142% |
| Revenue | 355M | 85.4M | 416% |
| Total Cash | 16.1M | 6.88M | 234% |
| Total Debt | 383M | 153M | 250% |
FMBH | PKBK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PKBK's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (96). This means that PKBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.
PKBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (55). This means that PKBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.
FMBH's SMR Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PKBK (56). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to PKBK’s over the last 12 months.
PKBK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (42). This means that PKBK’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.
FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PKBK (39). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to PKBK’s over the last 12 months.
| FMBH | PKBK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 13 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 45% | 5 days ago 66% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BMPEX | 29.39 | 0.37 | +1.27% |
| Beck Mack + Oliver Partners | |||
| POVDX | 36.77 | N/A | N/A |
| Putnam International Equity R5 | |||
| DISYX | 23.34 | N/A | N/A |
| BNY Mellon International Stock Fund Y | |||
| MNBRX | 20.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R | |||
| IGAAX | 50.74 | -0.06 | -0.12% |
| American Funds Intl Gr and Inc A | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with UVSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then UVSP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMBH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMBH | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| UVSP - FMBH | 87% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| BY - FMBH | 87% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| IBCP - FMBH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SHBI - FMBH | 86% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| SRCE - FMBH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PKBK has been closely correlated with IBCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PKBK jumps, then IBCP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PKBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PKBK | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| IBCP - PKBK | 78% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| BY - PKBK | 78% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| FMBH - PKBK | 77% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| HBCP - PKBK | 75% Closely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| UVSP - PKBK | 75% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
More | ||||