Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSRX vs RNPEX
FMSRX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FMSRX vs RNPEX
FMSRX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSRX vs. RNPEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSRX is a Buy and RNPEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FMSRX (14.6M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FMSRX: RNPEX (0.93) vs FMSRX (0.82). FMSRX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FMSRX (6 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FMSRX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). FMSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNPEX (23.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSRX: RNPEX (250) vs FMSRX (10000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.88 vs. FMSRX (-7.63). FMSRX return over 5 years is better than : 25.40 vs. RNPEX (10.38).
| FMSRX | RNPEX | FMSRX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.75 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 0.75 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.193 | 6.550 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.6M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.93 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.63 | 3.88 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.48 | 39.58 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.40 | 10.38 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 109.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement