Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSRX vs RNPEX
FMSRX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FMSRX vs RNPEX
FMSRX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FMSRX (27.6M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FMSRX: RNPEX (0.93) vs FMSRX (0.86). FMSRX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FMSRX (6 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FMSRX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). FMSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNPEX (23.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSRX: RNPEX (250) vs FMSRX (10000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.82 vs. FMSRX (2.99). FMSRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.65 vs. RNPEX (19.04).
| FMSRX | RNPEX | FMSRX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.75 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 0.75 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.487 | 7.230 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.6M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.93 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.99 | 13.82 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.01 | 43.99 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.65 | 19.04 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement