Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSRX vs RNPGX
FMSRX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FMSRX vs RNPGX
FMSRX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FMSRX (27.6M). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FMSRX: RNPGX (1.23) vs FMSRX (0.86). FMSRX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FMSRX (6 years) vs RNPGX (17 years). FMSRX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.40). FMSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNPGX (23.00). RNPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSRX: RNPGX (250) vs FMSRX (10000). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.36 vs. FMSRX (2.99). FMSRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.65 vs. RNPGX (21.23).
| FMSRX | RNPGX | FMSRX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.40 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 0.40 | 568% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.487 | 7.401 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.6M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.23 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.99 | 14.36 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.01 | 45.94 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.65 | 21.23 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 119.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement