Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSRX vs RNPGX
FMSRX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FMSRX vs RNPGX
FMSRX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSRX vs. RNPGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSRX is a Buy and RNPGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FMSRX (14.6M). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FMSRX: RNPGX (1.23) vs FMSRX (0.82). FMSRX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FMSRX (6 years) vs RNPGX (17 years). FMSRX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.40). FMSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RNPGX (23.00). RNPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSRX: RNPGX (250) vs FMSRX (10000). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.37 vs. FMSRX (-7.63). FMSRX return over 5 years is better than : 25.40 vs. RNPGX (12.40).
| FMSRX | RNPGX | FMSRX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.40 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 0.40 | 568% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.193 | 6.820 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.6M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.63 | 4.37 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.48 | 41.47 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.40 | 12.40 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement