FMX
Price
$118.55
Change
+$0.99 (+0.84%)
Updated
May 3, 2:49 PM EST
83 days until earnings call
TAP
Price
$57.85
Change
+$0.03 (+0.05%)
Updated
May 3, 6:59 PM EST
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions FMX vs TAP

Header iconFMX vs TAP Comparison
Open Charts FMX vs TAPBanner chart's image
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB DE CV
Price$118.55
Change+$0.99 (+0.84%)
Volume$640
CapitalizationN/A
Molson Coors Beverage
Price$57.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
Volume$392.34K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FMX vs TAP Comparison Chart

Loading...

FMXDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
TAPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
FMX vs. TAP commentary
May 03, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMX is a Sell and TAP is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 03, 2024
Stock price -- (FMX: $117.56 vs. TAP: $57.80)
Brand notoriety: FMX: Not notable vs. TAP: Notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMX: 67% vs. TAP: 153%
Market capitalization -- FMX: $233.07B vs. TAP: $14.3B
FMX [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $233.07B. TAP’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $14.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $19.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMX is a better buy in the long-term than TAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMX is a better buy in the short-term than TAP.

Price Growth

FMX (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +2.13% price change this week, while TAP (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -7.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMX is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

TAP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+0.35% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FMX with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for TAP with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMX($233B) has a higher market cap than TAP($14.3B). FMX has higher P/E ratio than TAP: FMX (112.91) vs TAP (15.41). TAP YTD gains are higher at: -4.277 vs. FMX (-9.812).
FMXTAPFMX / TAP
Capitalization233B14.3B1,629%
EBITDAN/A2.17B-
Gain YTD-9.812-4.277229%
P/E Ratio112.9115.41733%
RevenueN/A11.7B-
Total CashN/A869M-
Total DebtN/A6.27B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMX vs TAP: Fundamental Ratings
FMX
TAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5960
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3473
SMR RATING
1..100
4181
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6799
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAP's Valuation (26) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (41) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.

FMX's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (73) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

FMX's SMR Rating (41) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (81) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

FMX's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (63) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.

FMX's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (99) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMXTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FMXDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
TAPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLT1.690.20
+13.42%
Glatfelter Corp
OBLG0.120.01
+5.55%
Oblong
AGIO34.580.92
+2.73%
Agios Pharmaceuticals
GCBC30.920.67
+2.21%
Greene County Bancorp
MKTX209.122.88
+1.40%
MarketAxess Holdings

FMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMX has been loosely correlated with ABEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMX jumps, then ABEV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMX
1D Price
Change %
FMX100%
-0.45%
ABEV - FMX
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
TAP - FMX
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
STZ - FMX
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
DEO - FMX
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
CCU - FMX
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
More

TAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with STZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then STZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAP
1D Price
Change %
TAP100%
+1.26%
STZ - TAP
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
ABEV - TAP
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
CCU - TAP
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
BUD - TAP
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
SAM - TAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More