ABEV
Price
$3.17
Change
+$0.02 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
48.67B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TAP
Price
$39.72
Change
+$0.08 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.47B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABEV vs TAP

ABEV vs TAP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABEV vs. TAP commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABEV is a Hold and TAP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ABEV: $3.14 vs. TAP: $39.64)
Brand notoriety: ABEV: Not notable vs. TAP: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABEV: 80% vs. TAP: 129%
Market capitalization -- ABEV: $48.29B vs. TAP: $7.44B
ABEV [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] is valued at $48.29B. TAP’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $7.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $155.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $40.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABEV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABEV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABEV is a better buy in the long-term than TAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABEV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABEV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TAP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAP is a better buy in the short-term than ABEV.

Price Growth

ABEV (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -3.38% price change this week, while TAP (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -3.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABEV is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

TAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-0.75% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABEV($48.7B) has a higher market cap than TAP($7.47B). ABEV has higher P/E ratio than TAP: ABEV (16.29) vs TAP (8.52). ABEV YTD gains are higher at: 27.126 vs. TAP (-13.180). ABEV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29B vs. TAP (-1.45B). ABEV has more cash in the bank: 19.6B vs. TAP (383M). ABEV has less debt than TAP: ABEV (3.11B) vs TAP (6.27B). ABEV has higher revenues than TAP: ABEV (88.2B) vs TAP (11.2B).
ABEVTAPABEV / TAP
Capitalization48.7B7.47B652%
EBITDA29B-1.45B-2,002%
Gain YTD27.126-13.180-206%
P/E Ratio16.298.52191%
Revenue88.2B11.2B788%
Total Cash19.6B383M5,117%
Total Debt3.11B6.27B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABEV vs TAP: Fundamental Ratings
ABEV
TAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7918
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
5296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4068
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAP's Valuation (11) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as ABEV (13). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to ABEV’s over the last 12 months.

ABEV's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (100). This means that ABEV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

ABEV's SMR Rating (52) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (96). This means that ABEV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

ABEV's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (62). This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.

ABEV's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (68). This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABEVTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABEV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICCM5.930.53
+9.81%
Icecure Medical Ltd
FFIN33.110.33
+1.01%
First Financial Bankshares
TDAC10.73-0.02
-0.19%
Translational Development Acquisition Corp.
WPM121.72-0.85
-0.69%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp
AZTA22.27-1.04
-4.46%
Azenta

ABEV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABEV has been loosely correlated with BUD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABEV jumps, then BUD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABEV
1D Price
Change %
ABEV100%
+0.64%
BUD - ABEV
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
CCU - ABEV
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
FMX - ABEV
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
DEO - ABEV
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
TAP - ABEV
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More

TAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAP
1D Price
Change %
TAP100%
+0.61%
SAM - TAP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
STZ - TAP
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
BUD - TAP
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
DEO - TAP
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
ABEV - TAP
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More