FULT
Price
$24.64
Change
+$0.12 (+0.49%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.69B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HOMB
Price
$31.40
Change
+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.27B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs HOMB

FULT vs HOMB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) vs. Home BancShares, Inc. (HOMB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FULT and HOMB are both well-established regional banks, but they differ significantly in geographic footprint, operational efficiency, and growth trajectory.
  • Home BancShares (HOMB) consistently posts industry-leading profitability metrics, including a net interest margin (NIM) above 4.6% and a sub-40% efficiency ratio, signaling exceptional cost discipline.
  • Fulton Financial (FULT) has demonstrated stronger recent price momentum, aided by strategic acquisitions and expanding deposit initiatives across the Mid-Atlantic region.
  • Both companies maintain solid capital positions, though HOMB's Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of 16.3% substantially exceeds FULT's 11.8%, providing a larger capital buffer.
  • FULT offers a higher dividend yield at approximately 3.4% versus HOMB's roughly 2.7%, which may appeal to income-focused investors.

Introduction

Regional banks occupy a critical niche in the U.S. financial system, serving communities and businesses that often fall outside the footprint of the largest national institutions. FULT (Fulton Financial Corporation) and HOMB (Home BancShares, Inc.) represent two distinct approaches to regional banking: one rooted in the Mid-Atlantic's legacy markets and the other thriving across the Sun Belt. Both have attracted investor attention in recent months due to shifts in interest rate expectations, evolving credit conditions, and broader sector rotation. This comparison examines how these two institutions stack up across profitability, momentum, risk management, and market positioning — offering a clear, data-driven reference point for traders and investors evaluating regional bank exposure.

FULT Overview and Recent Performance

Fulton Financial Corporation, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, is a financial holding company with origins dating back to 1882. Through its primary subsidiary, Fulton Bank, the company provides retail and commercial banking, wealth management, and trust services across Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, and Virginia. With total assets exceeding $32 billion and a market capitalization of approximately $4.2 billion, FULT has been actively reshaping its competitive profile in recent quarters.

Over recent weeks, FULT has drawn positive attention following solid earnings reports that highlighted strong deposit growth and improving loan origination trends. The company's full-year 2025 results showed net income available to common shareholders of $381.4 million, or $2.08 per diluted share, representing a notable 17% increase in operating diluted earnings per share (EPS) year-over-year. Net interest margin (NIM) — a key measure of lending profitability — held at 3.59% in the fourth quarter of 2025, reflecting effective management of funding costs as deposit initiatives gained traction. CEO Curtis Myers has emphasized a 25% year-over-year increase in consumer demand deposit account openings, signaling ongoing franchise momentum.

Strategic M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity has been another significant factor shaping sentiment around FULT. The integration of Republic First Bank's operations and the pending acquisition of Blue Foundry Bancorp are expected to expand the company's presence in Northern New Jersey, a densely populated and commercially attractive market. Meanwhile, share repurchase programs and a consistent dividend — yielding roughly 3.4% — have further supported shareholder returns. The stock's trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio has hovered near 10, suggesting a relatively modest valuation compared to the broader regional banking sector.

HOMB Overview and Recent Performance

Home BancShares, Inc., based in Conway, Arkansas, is the parent company of Centennial Bank, which operates a network of branches across Arkansas, Florida, Alabama, Texas, and New York. Founded in 1998, the company has grown to manage approximately $22.9 billion in total assets and holds a market capitalization of roughly $5.5 billion. HOMB has built a reputation for disciplined underwriting and operational excellence, reflected in some of the most enviable profitability metrics in the regional banking space.

In recent market activity, HOMB has continued to demonstrate robust financial performance. The company reported record full-year 2025 net income of $475.4 million, an 18% increase from the prior year, with diluted EPS reaching $2.41. Particularly striking is the bank's NIM, which expanded to 4.61% in the fourth quarter of 2025 — a level that ranks among the highest in its peer group. This was accompanied by an efficiency ratio of 39.54%, meaning the bank spends less than 40 cents to generate each dollar of revenue, a benchmark of cost control. Return on assets (ROA) — a measure of how efficiently a company uses its assets to generate profit — stood at a strong 2.06% annualized.

Chairman John Allison has credited loan growth of over $400 million in the fourth quarter alone as a key driver of the bank's momentum. Additionally, HOMB maintains a CET1 capital ratio of 16.3%, well above regulatory requirements, underscoring a conservative approach to balance sheet management. The company has also been active in returning capital to shareholders through dividends and buybacks, though its dividend yield, at approximately 2.7%, is somewhat lower than FULT's. The stock's P/E ratio has traded in the 11–12 range, reflecting a premium that the market assigns to its superior profitability and efficiency.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where speed, precision, and data-driven decision-making have become indispensable, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page serves as a curated hub for AI-powered trading strategies. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that span thousands of tickers, but only a select group — those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions — earn a spot in the Trending section. These bots employ diverse strategies: some focus on high-volatility price action, others on medium-volatility swing trades, and still others on cross-asset intelligence. Performance metrics vary, with select bots generating annualized returns ranging from 30% to well over 150%, and win rates frequently exceeding 65% to 75%. Each bot operates with distinct trading styles, timeframes, and risk parameters, giving users the ability to explore strategies that match their objectives. To see which bots are currently leading, visit the Trending AI Robots page and review real-time data for yourself.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, FULT and HOMB reveal meaningful contrasts that go beyond their shared classification as regional banks. From a profitability standpoint, HOMB holds a clear advantage: its NIM of 4.61%, ROA above 2.0%, and sub-40% efficiency ratio all outpace FULT's corresponding metrics. These figures suggest that HOMB extracts greater earnings power from its asset base and operates with tighter cost controls — qualities that tend to command a valuation premium.

On the growth and expansion front, however, FULT offers a more dynamic narrative. Its acquisition strategy — including the integration of Republic First and the upcoming Blue Foundry deal — signals an active effort to deepen market share in the Mid-Atlantic. Loan origination growth and deposit account momentum have provided additional tailwinds, and the stock has responded with stronger price appreciation over recent months. HOMB, by contrast, has grown organically with less headline-making M&A, relying instead on operational consistency to drive results.

Risk profiles also differ. HOMB's CET1 ratio of 16.3% gives it a considerably thicker capital cushion than FULT's 11.8%. However, FULT carries less total debt relative to its size. Geographic exposure is another point of divergence: FULT is concentrated in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast, while HOMB's Sun Belt footprint — especially Florida and Texas — places it in faster-growing population centers but also exposes it to different economic sensitivities, such as real estate cycles in those regions. From a sentiment perspective, both stocks have benefited from easing inflation data and expectations of a more stable interest rate environment, which has broadly lifted regional bank valuations in recent months.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable technical and fundamental patterns, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely tilt favorably toward HOMB (Home BancShares) in the current environment — though the margin is not overwhelming. HOMB's combination of superior NIM, best-in-class efficiency, consistent earnings growth, and a robust capital buffer creates a profile that AI models typically reward for trend consistency and lower fundamental risk. That said, FULT's stronger recent price momentum, its appealing dividend yield, and the potential catalysts tied to ongoing M&A integration introduce upside variables that a probabilistic model would not ignore. In practice, the AI's preference would depend on the specific strategy: a bot tuned for stability and quality metrics might favor HOMB, while a momentum-oriented bot could find FULT more compelling at current levels. Ultimately, both stocks present credible cases, and the final weighting depends on which factors an investor or algorithm prioritizes most.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
FULT vs. HOMB commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and HOMB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $24.52 vs. HOMB: $31.35)
Brand notoriety: FULT and HOMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 38% vs. HOMB: 60%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.69B vs. HOMB: $6.27B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.69B. HOMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHOMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HOMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than HOMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOMB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HOMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than HOMB.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while HOMB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

HOMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOMB($6.27B) has a higher market cap than FULT($4.7B). HOMB has higher P/E ratio than FULT: HOMB (12.95) vs FULT (11.79). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 29.058 vs. HOMB (15.414). FULT has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. HOMB (296M). HOMB has less debt than FULT: HOMB (780M) vs FULT (1.25B). FULT has higher revenues than HOMB: FULT (1.33B) vs HOMB (1.11B).
FULTHOMBFULT / HOMB
Capitalization4.7B6.27B75%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.05815.414189%
P/E Ratio11.7912.9591%
Revenue1.33B1.11B120%
Total Cash312M296M105%
Total Debt1.25B780M161%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs HOMB: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
HOMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6587
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3226
SMR RATING
1..100
2428
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4150
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (57). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

HOMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (32). This means that HOMB’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (28). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (45). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (50). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTHOMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIO26.750.31
+1.17%
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund
IEFA101.210.20
+0.20%
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
JULJ25.030.03
+0.12%
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Jul
ZAPR26.900.02
+0.06%
Innovator Equity Dfnd Prt ETF -1 Yr Apr
NBIL33.66-1.19
-3.41%
GraniteShares 2x Long NBIS Daily ETF

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+0.49%
ASB - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
More

HOMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOMB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOMB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOMB
1D Price
Change %
HOMB100%
+0.74%
UBSI - HOMB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
FULT - HOMB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
INDB - HOMB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
UCB - HOMB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
FNB - HOMB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More