FULT
Price
$23.36
Change
+$0.36 (+1.57%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.46B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HOMB
Price
$28.25
Change
+$0.40 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.69B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs HOMB

Header iconFULT vs HOMB Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs HOMBBanner chart's image
FULT vs HOMB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Fulton Financial (FULT) vs Home BancShares (HOMB) Earnings Preview: Q1 Reports Due in Mid-April

Key Takeaways

  • Both FULT and HOMB are regional banks with strong capital positions; HOMB reports Q1 earnings on April 15, followed by FULT on April 22.
  • Analysts project HOMB Q1 EPS at $0.60 on $272 million revenue, reflecting 7% EPS growth year-over-year.
  • FULT Q1 EPS consensus at $0.50, with full-year 2026 guidance for $1.12-1.14 billion NII (net interest income, profit from loans minus deposit costs).
  • Recent Q4 results showed FULT operating EPS $0.55 (beat estimates), NIM 3.59%; HOMB EPS $0.60, NIM 4.61%.
  • Both maintain robust CET1 ratios (FULT 11.8%, HOMB 16.3%) and pay dividends (FULT $0.19/share, HOMB $0.21/share).
  • HOMB edges in growth metrics with record 2025 net income of $475 million, up 18%.

Earnings Context and Why This Comparison Matters

Quarterly earnings remain a critical gauge for regional banks like Fulton Financial and Home BancShares, revealing resilience amid interest rate shifts, loan demand, and deposit competition. Both operate in complementary U.S. regions—Fulton in the Mid-Atlantic (Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia) with $32 billion in assets, and Home BancShares via Centennial Bank in the Southeast (Arkansas, Florida, Texas, Alabama, New York) with $23 billion in assets. They compete in commercial real estate lending and retail banking, where NII drives profitability. Investors watch these reports for insights into NIM expansion, credit quality (measured by NCOs, or net charge-offs), and capital returns via dividends and buybacks. With Q1 filings imminent, this matchup highlights operational efficiency and growth potential in a stabilizing rate environment.

Home BancShares (HOMB) Focus

Home BancShares (HOMB) will release Q1 2026 earnings after market close on April 15, followed by a conference call on April 16. Analysts forecast EPS of $0.60, up 7% year-over-year, on $272 million in revenue (4.6% growth). This follows a stellar 2025, with full-year EPS of $2.41 (20% increase) and net income of $475 million (18% rise). Q4 alone delivered $0.60 EPS on $282 million revenue, with NIM at 4.61%, efficiency ratio under 40%, and loan growth to $15.7 billion. Deposits reached $17.5 billion, supporting a low loan-to-deposit ratio. CET1 stood at 16.3%, enabling a $0.21 quarterly dividend. Key watches: sustained loan expansion ($400 million Q4 growth), deposit stability, and provision for loan losses amid CRE exposure (53% of portfolio).

Fulton Financial (FULT) Context

Fulton Financial (FULT) reports Q1 2026 earnings on April 22, with a call on April 23. Consensus calls for $0.50 EPS, aligning with guidance amid one expected Fed cut. Full-year NII outlook is $1.12-1.14 billion. Q4 2025 operating EPS hit $0.55 (beat by 8%), revenue $336 million, NIM 3.59%, and ROTCE around 11%. Loans grew modestly to $24.1 billion, deposits to $26.6 billion (loan-to-deposit 91%), with CET1 at 11.8%. The $0.19 dividend persists, backed by a $150 million buyback. Recent Blue Foundry acquisition bolsters New Jersey presence, targeting 5%+ EPS accretion. Focus areas: integration synergies, expense control (guidance $800-835 million), and NIM stability post-rate cuts.

Head-to-Head Earnings and Market Comparison

HOMB outperforms on growth and margins, with higher NIM (4.61% vs. 3.59%), ROA (~2.1%), and CET1 (16.3% vs. 11.8%), fueled by loan expansion and sub-40% efficiency. Full-year 2025 net income surged 18% to $475 million versus Fulton's $397 million operating. FULT shines in scale ($32B vs. $23B assets), deposit breadth, and capital returns ($59M buybacks in 2025). Both exhibit low NCOs and strong liquidity, but HOMB's Southeast footprint taps faster demographics, while FULT leverages M&A for diversification. Risks include CRE concentration and rate sensitivity; sentiment favors HOMB for momentum, FULT for stability.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Try the AI Screener today to uncover your next investment edge.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron AI currently favors HOMB with a 65% probability edge over FULT, driven by superior earnings growth (18-20% in 2025), higher NIM, ROTCE, and CET1 buffer for resilience and buybacks amid economic uncertainty.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FULT vs. HOMB commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and HOMB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $23.36 vs. HOMB: $28.25)
Brand notoriety: FULT and HOMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 130% vs. HOMB: 84%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.46B vs. HOMB: $5.69B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.46B. HOMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHOMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HOMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than HOMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOMB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HOMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOMB is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.42% price change this week, while HOMB (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

HOMB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOMB($5.69B) has a higher market cap than FULT($4.47B). HOMB (11.63) and FULT (11.12) have similar P/E ratio . FULT YTD gains are higher at: 21.988 vs. HOMB (3.230). FULT has more cash in the bank: 271M vs. HOMB (237M). HOMB has less debt than FULT: HOMB (780M) vs FULT (1.25B). FULT has higher revenues than HOMB: FULT (1.33B) vs HOMB (1.08B).
FULTHOMBFULT / HOMB
Capitalization4.47B5.69B78%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.9883.230681%
P/E Ratio11.1211.6396%
Revenue1.33B1.08B122%
Total Cash271M237M114%
Total Debt1.25B780M161%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs HOMB: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
HOMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3929
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4364
SMR RATING
1..100
2327
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4667
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6545

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (47). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (64). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (27). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (49). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOMB (67). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HOMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTHOMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGDM66.442.24
+3.49%
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
LSAF51.830.27
+0.53%
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF
FENI40.290.13
+0.32%
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
IAUI51.290.08
+0.16%
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
BLKC20.63N/A
N/A
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+1.57%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
FNB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+1.91%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+2.35%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
ONB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
More

HOMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOMB has been closely correlated with INDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOMB jumps, then INDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOMB
1D Price
Change %
HOMB100%
+1.44%
INDB - HOMB
88%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
FULT - HOMB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
FNB - HOMB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.91%
UBSI - HOMB
87%
Closely correlated
+2.35%
UCB - HOMB
86%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
More