FNGO
Price
$151.84
Change
-$3.59 (-2.31%)
Updated
Sep 4, 03:48 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
748.6M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QULL
Price
$70.67
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 18, 12:21 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
40.87M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNGO vs QULL

FNGO vs QULL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) vs. ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL)

Key Takeaways

  • FNGO delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to a concentrated, equal-weighted basket of 10 high-growth technology and consumer discretionary stocks, while QULL provides 2x daily leveraged exposure to a broader, sector-neutral index of large- and mid-cap U.S. equities selected for quality characteristics.
  • Both products are exchange-traded notes (ETNs) with identical 0.95% expense ratios and daily-reset leverage mechanics, exposing investors to issuer credit risk in addition to market and compounding effects.
  • FNGO features extreme concentration in names such as NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, resulting in higher sector-specific risk within information technology and communication services.
  • QULL emphasizes fundamental quality metrics including high return on equity (ROE), low leverage, and low earnings variability, producing more balanced sector allocations across the U.S. equity market.
  • Structural differences position FNGO for investors seeking amplified exposure to megacap growth themes, whereas QULL appeals to those targeting quality-factor resilience within a leveraged framework.
  • Both ETNs carry elevated volatility due to daily leverage compounding and are generally suited for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified exposure to U.S. equity growth or quality factors often consider leveraged products such as FNGO and QULL. These two exchange-traded notes do not compete directly but instead offer distinct leveraged strategies within overlapping thematic universes. FNGO targets concentrated technology and consumer discretionary leaders, while QULL applies leverage to a diversified quality-factor index. Comparing their structures helps investors understand trade-offs in concentration, factor exposure, and risk management within the current environment of evolving technology leadership and quality preferences.

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) Overview

FNGO is a 2x leveraged exchange-traded note issued by Bank of Montreal that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the NYSE FANG+ Index. The underlying index consists of 10 equally weighted stocks representing highly traded growth companies in technology and tech-enabled sectors. Top holdings typically include NVDA, AAPL, AMZN, AVGO, META, and MSFT, among others. Sector allocations are heavily weighted toward information technology and communication services. The ETN carries a 0.95% expense ratio and resets leverage daily, making it sensitive to volatility decay over extended holding periods.

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) Overview

QULL is a 2x leveraged exchange-traded note issued by UBS that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. This index selects large- and mid-cap U.S. securities exhibiting strong quality traits—high return on equity, low leverage, and low earnings variability—relative to sector peers, with sector-neutral weighting. The approach results in broader diversification across multiple sectors compared with pure growth or technology-focused products. The ETN maintains a 0.95% expense ratio and applies daily leverage resets, introducing similar compounding considerations as other daily-reset leveraged products.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both products operate within the broader U.S. equity market, where technology leadership, artificial intelligence adoption, and factor rotations influence capital flows. Quality-factor strategies emphasize balance-sheet strength and earnings stability, which can provide relative resilience during periods of economic uncertainty or rising interest-rate volatility. In contrast, concentrated growth themes tied to artificial intelligence and digital transformation continue to attract inflows during innovation-driven market cycles. Regulatory developments around technology competition and data privacy, along with macroeconomic shifts in inflation and monetary policy, remain key variables affecting both leveraged exposures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, FNGO has exhibited higher sensitivity to movements in megacap technology names due to its narrow holdings list and equal weighting. This concentration can amplify returns during strong technology rallies but also magnifies drawdowns during sector-specific corrections. QULL’s sector-neutral quality construction tends to produce more moderate volatility relative to pure technology leverage, as quality characteristics may buffer performance during rotations away from growth stocks. Daily leverage compounding affects both products, with the magnitude of divergence from underlying index returns increasing during high-volatility periods. Relative positioning therefore depends on investor views regarding technology momentum versus quality-factor durability.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors interested in discovering additional leveraged or thematic products may benefit from exploring the platform.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to QULL. The broader diversification inherent in the sector-neutral quality index, combined with exposure to fundamental resilience factors, may offer a more balanced risk profile within a leveraged construct compared with FNGO’s concentrated technology basket. Cost structures are equivalent, yet the quality-factor methodology provides potential for more consistent behavior across varying market regimes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FNGO vs. QULL commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGO is a StrongBuy and QULL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNGO has more net assets: 749M vs. QULL (40.9M). FNGO has a higher annual dividend yield than QULL: FNGO (33.382) vs QULL (24.369). FNGO was incepted earlier than QULL: FNGO (8 years) vs QULL (6 years).
FNGOQULLFNGO / QULL
Gain YTD33.38224.369137%
Net Assets749M40.9M1,831%
Total Expense Ratio0.95N/A-
TurnoverN/AN/A-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence8 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNGOQULL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QULL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUC6.320.17
+2.76%
ATIF Holdings Limited.
ROG126.292.23
+1.80%
Rogers Corp
IMXI14.460.07
+0.52%
International Money Express
OXLCM25.00-0.12
-0.48%
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
UDR36.37-0.22
-0.60%
UDR