Ad is loading...
FNKCX vs MVCAX
FNKCX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FNKCX vs MVCAX
FNKCX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNKCX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNKCX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.6B vs. FNKCX (22.4M). FNKCX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: FNKCX (1.78) vs MVCAX (1.16). FNKCX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FNKCX (14 years) vs MVCAX (23 years). FNKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.16 vs. MVCAX (19.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNKCX: MVCAX (1000) vs FNKCX (1500). FNKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.80 vs. MVCAX (9.50). MVCAX (30.79) and FNKCX (29.72) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNKCX | MVCAX | FNKCX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.138 | 2.966 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.4M | 17.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.16 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.80 | 9.50 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.92 | 2.65 | 563% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.72 | 30.79 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.43 | 74.34 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers