Ad is loading...
FNKCX vs MVCAX
FNKCX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FNKCX vs MVCAX
FNKCX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNKCX vs. MVCAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNKCX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 15.4B vs. FNKCX (21.4M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FNKCX: MVCAX (0.90) vs FNKCX (0.34). FNKCX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FNKCX (15 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FNKCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). FNKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.08 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNKCX: MVCAX (1000) vs FNKCX (1500). FNKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.04 vs. MVCAX (-8.14). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.79 vs. FNKCX (15.84).
| FNKCX | MVCAX | FNKCX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.99 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.00 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.261 | -9.648 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4M | 15.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.90 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | -8.14 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.19 | -6.94 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.84 | 54.79 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.97 | 42.27 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...