FNRN
Price
$18.40
Change
+$0.16 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
301.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFBC
Price
$104.44
Change
-$0.05 (-0.05%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNRN vs PFBC

FNRN vs PFBC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNRN vs. PFBC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNRN is a Buy and PFBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FNRN: $18.40 vs. PFBC: $104.44)
Brand notoriety: FNRN and PFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNRN: 23% vs. PFBC: 29%
Market capitalization -- FNRN: $301.89M vs. PFBC: $1.24B
FNRN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $301.89M. PFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNRN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNRN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFBC is a better buy in the long-term than FNRN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNRN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNRN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNRN is a better buy in the short-term than PFBC.

Price Growth

FNRN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.55% price change this week, while PFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFBC($1.24B) has a higher market cap than FNRN($302M). FNRN has higher P/E ratio than PFBC: FNRN (14.24) vs PFBC (9.75). FNRN YTD gains are higher at: 44.611 vs. PFBC (13.349). PFBC has higher revenues than FNRN: PFBC (286M) vs FNRN (75.2M).
FNRNPFBCFNRN / PFBC
Capitalization302M1.24B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.61113.349334%
P/E Ratio14.249.75146%
Revenue75.2M286M26%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A383M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNRN vs PFBC: Fundamental Ratings
FNRN
PFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1029
SMR RATING
1..100
6139
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1948
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFBC's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNRN (93) in the null industry. This means that PFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNRN’s over the last 12 months.

FNRN's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (29) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNRN’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

PFBC's SMR Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNRN (61) in the null industry. This means that PFBC’s stock grew similarly to FNRN’s over the last 12 months.

FNRN's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNRN’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FNRN's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as PFBC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNRN’s stock grew similarly to PFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNRNPFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNRN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STDFX41.890.38
+0.92%
Allspring Large Cap Growth Admin
POGAX75.320.68
+0.91%
Putnam Large Cap Growth A
JICCX82.860.64
+0.78%
JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders C
GLNLX25.20-0.10
-0.40%
MFS Global New Discovery R3
MMUBX26.08-0.22
-0.84%
MFS Utilities B

FNRN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNRN has been loosely correlated with ORRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNRN jumps, then ORRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNRN
1D Price
Change %
FNRN100%
+0.88%
ORRF - FNRN
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
PFBC - FNRN
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
PCB - FNRN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
NBTB - FNRN
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
RF - FNRN
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More