FNWB
Price
$11.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
105.48M
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TCBX
Price
$45.49
Change
+$0.20 (+0.44%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
757.63M
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNWB vs TCBX

FNWB vs TCBX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNWB vs. TCBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWB is a Hold and TCBX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FNWB: $11.09 vs. TCBX: $45.49)
Brand notoriety: FNWB and TCBX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWB: 40% vs. TCBX: 80%
Market capitalization -- FNWB: $105.48M vs. TCBX: $757.63M
FNWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $105.48M. TCBX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $757.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCBX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCBX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNWB is a better buy in the long-term than TCBX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCBX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNWB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TCBX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNWB is a better buy in the short-term than TCBX.

Price Growth

FNWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.65% price change this week, while TCBX (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

TCBX is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCBX($758M) has a higher market cap than FNWB($105M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than TCBX: FNWB (65.24) vs TCBX (11.32). TCBX YTD gains are higher at: 19.679 vs. FNWB (18.230). TCBX has more cash in the bank: 113M vs. FNWB (16.8M). TCBX has less debt than FNWB: TCBX (158M) vs FNWB (344M). TCBX has higher revenues than FNWB: TCBX (219M) vs FNWB (67.8M).
FNWBTCBXFNWB / TCBX
Capitalization105M758M14%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.23019.67993%
P/E Ratio65.2411.32576%
Revenue67.8M219M31%
Total Cash16.8M113M15%
Total Debt344M158M218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWB: Fundamental Ratings
FNWB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWBTCBX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNWB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TCBX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGIGX39.420.38
+0.97%
Steward Global Equity Income Fund R6
PRJAX36.590.18
+0.49%
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities A
GSIMX24.120.11
+0.46%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
RMBGX39.650.12
+0.30%
RMB I
JNPSX27.26N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value D

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with OZKAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then OZKAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
N/A
OZKAP - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
TCBX - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
RNST - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
FFIN - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
SFST - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More

TCBX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCBX has been closely correlated with IBCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TCBX jumps, then IBCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCBX
1D Price
Change %
TCBX100%
+0.44%
IBCP - TCBX
78%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
FMBH - TCBX
76%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
THFF - TCBX
74%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
HBT - TCBX
74%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
MPB - TCBX
74%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
More