Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs FTMKX
FNWFX vs FTMKX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs FTMKX
FNWFX vs FTMKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. FTMKX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and FTMKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FTMKX (13.9B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than FTMKX: FNWFX (1.24) vs FTMKX (0.81). FNWFX was incepted earlier than FTMKX: FNWFX (9 years) vs FTMKX (22 years). FTMKX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). FTMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: FTMKX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). FTMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.96 vs. FNWFX (15.83). FTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 44.85 vs. FNWFX (13.73).
| FNWFX | FTMKX | FNWFX / FTMKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.42 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.42 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.016 | 21.742 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 13.9B | 653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.81 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.83 | 39.96 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.60 | 83.64 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.73 | 44.85 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 144.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers