Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs FZAEX
FNWFX vs FZAEX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs FZAEX
FNWFX vs FZAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. FZAEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and FZAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FZAEX (13.1B). FZAEX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: FZAEX (1.37) vs FNWFX (1.27). FNWFX was incepted earlier than FZAEX: FNWFX (10 years) vs FZAEX (13 years). FZAEX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FZAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). FZAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: FZAEX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). FZAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.38 vs. FNWFX (22.02). FZAEX return over 5 years is better than : 52.33 vs. FNWFX (18.79).
| FNWFX | FZAEX | FNWFX / FZAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.80 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.80 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.073 | 21.038 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 13.1B | 692% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.37 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.02 | 41.38 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.21 | 83.69 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.79 | 52.33 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 152.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers