Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs FZAEX
FNWFX vs FZAEX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs FZAEX
FNWFX vs FZAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. FZAEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and FZAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FZAEX (13.9B). FZAEX (1.29) and FNWFX (1.24) have matching dividends . FNWFX was incepted earlier than FZAEX: FNWFX (9 years) vs FZAEX (13 years). FZAEX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FZAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). FZAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: FZAEX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). FZAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.09 vs. FNWFX (19.73). FZAEX return over 5 years is better than : 49.86 vs. FNWFX (14.94).
| FNWFX | FZAEX | FNWFX / FZAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.80 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.80 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.743 | 25.283 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 13.9B | 653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.29 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | 51.09 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.48 | 92.43 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.94 | 49.86 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 163.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement