Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs MCEMX
FNWFX vs MCEMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs MCEMX
FNWFX vs MCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. MCEMX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and MCEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. MCEMX (427M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than MCEMX: FNWFX (1.24) vs MCEMX (0.54). FNWFX was incepted earlier than MCEMX: FNWFX (9 years) vs MCEMX (11 years). MCEMX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MCEMX (25.00). FNWFX (1000000) and MCEMX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.15 vs. FNWFX (23.95). MCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.51 vs. FNWFX (16.26).
| FNWFX | MCEMX | FNWFX / MCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.86 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.223 | 25.425 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 427M | 21,288% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.54 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.95 | 53.15 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.54 | 70.84 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.26 | 23.51 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 175.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement