Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs PCEMX
FNWFX vs PCEMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs PCEMX
FNWFX vs PCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. PCEMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and PCEMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. PCEMX (573M). PCEMX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: PCEMX (1.56) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than PCEMX: FNWFX (9 years) vs PCEMX (31 years). PCEMX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). PCEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). PCEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: PCEMX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). PCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.62 vs. FNWFX (19.73). PCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.68 vs. FNWFX (14.94).
| FNWFX | PCEMX | FNWFX / PCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.39 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.743 | 23.697 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 573M | 15,829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.56 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | 40.62 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.48 | 69.85 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.94 | 28.68 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement