Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs SBEMX
FNWFX vs SBEMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs SBEMX
FNWFX vs SBEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. SBEMX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and SBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SBEMX (106M). SBEMX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: SBEMX (2.21) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than SBEMX: FNWFX (9 years) vs SBEMX (15 years). SBEMX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). SBEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). SBEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: SBEMX (250000) vs FNWFX (1000000). SBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.22 vs. FNWFX (23.95). SBEMX return over 5 years is better than : 75.97 vs. FNWFX (16.26).
| FNWFX | SBEMX | FNWFX / SBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.99 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.68 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.223 | 25.064 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 106M | 85,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.21 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.95 | 48.22 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.54 | 108.62 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.26 | 75.97 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 211.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers