Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs SBEMX
FNWFX vs SBEMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs SBEMX
FNWFX vs SBEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. SBEMX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and SBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. SBEMX (109M). SBEMX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: SBEMX (2.34) vs FNWFX (1.27). FNWFX was incepted earlier than SBEMX: FNWFX (10 years) vs SBEMX (15 years). SBEMX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). SBEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). SBEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: SBEMX (250000) vs FNWFX (1000000). SBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.23 vs. FNWFX (19.69). SBEMX return over 5 years is better than : 92.67 vs. FNWFX (22.03).
| FNWFX | SBEMX | FNWFX / SBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.84 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.53 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.328 | 24.132 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 109M | 81,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.34 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.69 | 39.23 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.34 | 111.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.03 | 92.67 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 169.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement