FOA
Price
$22.62
Change
+$0.10 (+0.44%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
250.61M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PRAA
Price
$14.76
Change
+$0.45 (+3.14%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
576.73M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOA vs PRAA

Header iconFOA vs PRAA Comparison
Open Charts FOA vs PRAABanner chart's image
Finance of America Companies
Price$22.62
Change+$0.10 (+0.44%)
Volume$86.01K
Capitalization250.61M
PRA Group
Price$14.76
Change+$0.45 (+3.14%)
Volume$199.88K
Capitalization576.73M
FOA vs PRAA Comparison Chart in %
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOA vs. PRAA commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOA is a Buy and PRAA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FOA: $22.62 vs. PRAA: $14.76)
Brand notoriety: FOA and PRAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOA: 63% vs. PRAA: 71%
Market capitalization -- FOA: $250.61M vs. PRAA: $576.73M
FOA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $250.61M. PRAA’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $576.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $674.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRAA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FOA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PRAA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOA is a better buy in the long-term than PRAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRAA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRAA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOA is a better buy in the short-term than PRAA.

Price Growth

FOA (@Savings Banks) experienced а +5.50% price change this week, while PRAA (@Savings Banks) price change was +9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRAA is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+3.94% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRAA($577M) has a higher market cap than FOA($251M). PRAA has higher P/E ratio than FOA: PRAA (6.36) vs FOA (3.26). FOA YTD gains are higher at: -19.559 vs. PRAA (-29.344). PRAA has less debt than FOA: PRAA (3.64B) vs FOA (29.5B). PRAA has higher revenues than FOA: PRAA (1.14B) vs FOA (454M).
FOAPRAAFOA / PRAA
Capitalization251M577M44%
EBITDAN/A246M-
Gain YTD-19.559-29.34467%
P/E Ratio3.266.3651%
Revenue454M1.14B40%
Total CashN/A196M-
Total Debt29.5B3.64B810%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOA vs PRAA: Fundamental Ratings
FOA
PRAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1316
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
1879
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4781
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOA's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PRAA (29) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to PRAA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PRAA (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to PRAA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRAA (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRAA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRAA (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRAA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRAA (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than PRAA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOAPRAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KIROY6.320.04
+0.56%
Kumba Iron Ore Ltd.
SGPPY6.36N/A
N/A
Spar Group, Ltd.
MARUY247.49-0.43
-0.17%
Marubeni Corp.
GALKF0.06N/A
-0.59%
Galantas Gold Corp.
FRSPF0.65-0.02
-2.99%
First Phosphate Corp.

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOA and YRD have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOA and YRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
+0.44%
YRD - FOA
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
SOFI - FOA
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
PRAA - FOA
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
PYPL - FOA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CACC - FOA
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
More