Advertisement
FOCL vs SENS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOCL is a Hold and SENS is a Buy.
FOCL | SENS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SENS's Valuation (53) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FOCL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew similarly to FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's SMR Rating (99) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FOCL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew similarly to FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FOCL (38) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew similarly to FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOCL (99) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew significantly faster than FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
| FOCL | SENS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 85% | 17 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 60% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FOCL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SENS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FOCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SENS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FOCL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FOCL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SENS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FOCL (@Medical Distributors) experienced а +7.24% price change this week, while SENS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +9.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.93%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
SENS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Distributors (+0.28% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.03% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVS | 8.25 | 0.11 | +1.30% |
| Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X ETF (AVS) | |||
| VDE | 175.42 | 0.67 | +0.38% |
| Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) | |||
| PRNT | 24.91 | -0.07 | -0.27% |
| 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) | |||
| XJR | 48.79 | -0.14 | -0.29% |
| iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) | |||
| DBJP | 115.81 | -0.94 | -0.80% |
| Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) | |||
FOCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCL and AORT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCL and AORT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOCL | 100% | -3.16% | ||
| AORT - FOCL | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.12% | ||
| UFPT - FOCL | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.86% | ||
| SENS - FOCL | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.66% | ||
| STXS - FOCL | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
| HBIO - FOCL | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
SENS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SENS has been loosely correlated with RCEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SENS jumps, then RCEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SENS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENS | 100% | +3.66% | ||
| RCEL - SENS | 40% Loosely correlated | +5.75% | ||
| QSI - SENS | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.47% | ||
| CERS - SENS | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| VIVO - SENS | 32% Poorly correlated | +5.31% | ||
| MBOT - SENS | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||