Advertisement
FOCL vs SNYR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOCL is a StrongBuy and SNYR is a Buy.
| FOCL | SNYR | FOCL / SNYR | |
| Capitalization | 187M | 1.5M | 12,475% |
| EBITDA | -27M | -8.7M | 310% |
| Gain YTD | 24.620 | -94.591 | -26% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 4.61 | - |
| Revenue | 79.3M | 27.7M | 286% |
| Total Cash | 21.5M | 292K | 7,363% |
| Total Debt | 41.7M | 27.7M | 151% |
FOCL | SNYR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 95 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNYR's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SNYR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
SNYR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SNYR’s stock grew similarly to FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
SNYR's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCL (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SNYR’s stock grew similarly to FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
FOCL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNYR (95) in the null industry. This means that FOCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNYR’s over the last 12 months.
SNYR's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCL (99) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SNYR’s stock grew similarly to FOCL’s over the last 12 months.
| FOCL | SNYR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FOCL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SNYR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FOCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SNYR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FOCL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNYR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FOCL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SNYR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FOCL (@Medical Distributors) experienced а -1.20% price change this week, while SNYR (@Medical Distributors) price change was -1.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -4.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -32.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
SNYR is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Distributors (-4.78% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TEDIX | 32.92 | N/A | N/A |
| Franklin Mutual Global Discovery A | |||
| PIEKX | 39.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Victory Pioneer International Equ R6 | |||
| GSISX | 35.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG Svc | |||
| SUVQX | 15.23 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val R6 | |||
| WCFEX | 27.77 | N/A | N/A |
| WCM Focused Emerging Mkts Ex Chn Inv | |||
FOCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCL and AORT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCL and AORT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOCL | 100% | -1.44% | ||
| AORT - FOCL | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
| SNYR - FOCL | 21% Poorly correlated | -6.85% | ||
| UFPT - FOCL | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| SENS - FOCL | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| STXS - FOCL | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
SNYR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNYR and FOCL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNYR and FOCL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNYR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNYR | 100% | -6.85% | ||
| FOCL - SNYR | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| HKPD - SNYR | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.65% | ||
| COR - SNYR | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| AHG - SNYR | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.70% | ||
| COSM - SNYR | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||