FORM
Price
$106.20
Change
+$0.82 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
8.28B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SKYT
Price
$32.46
Change
+$1.88 (+6.15%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.6B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FORM vs SKYT

FORM vs SKYT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? FormFactor (FORM) vs. SkyWater Technology (SKYT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FormFactor (FORM) is a semiconductor test and measurement leader riding strong demand from AI-driven markets including HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), data center CPUs, and co-packaged optics, with record revenue of $258.2 million in its most recent quarter.
  • SkyWater Technology (SKYT) is a U.S.-based pure-play semiconductor foundry in the final stages of being acquired by quantum computing company IonQ (IONQ), with the deal expected to close imminently following final regulatory approval.
  • FORM has posted accelerating revenue growth (up 31.9% year-over-year) and expanding gross margins, while SKYT has undergone a transformative acquisition of Infineon's Fab 25 and is now transitioning toward life as an IonQ subsidiary.
  • Both stocks operate in the semiconductor sector but serve fundamentally different roles: FORM provides essential testing infrastructure, while SKYT manufactures chips as a domestic foundry.
  • Risk profiles diverge sharply: FORM faces cyclical semiconductor spending and tariff exposure, while SKYT carries merger-completion risk and integration uncertainty.

Introduction

Investors looking at the semiconductor landscape in mid-2026 face a market defined by AI-driven demand, reshoring priorities, and consolidation. Two names that capture different corners of this narrative are FORM (FormFactor, Inc.) and SKYT (SkyWater Technology, Inc.). While both are U.S.-headquartered semiconductor companies, their business models, growth drivers, and current market positioning are markedly different. FormFactor supplies the testing and measurement equipment that validates advanced chips, while SkyWater operates as a domestic foundry fabricating those chips. This comparison is particularly timely: FORM just reported blockbuster quarterly results, and SKYT stands on the cusp of completing its acquisition by IonQ. For traders evaluating relative strength, momentum, and risk, understanding how these two stocks compare is essential.

FORM Overview and Recent Performance

FormFactor, Inc. is a leading provider of test and measurement technologies that span the full semiconductor product lifecycle, from characterization and modeling to production testing. The company's probe cards, analytical probes, and test sockets are critical tools for semiconductor manufacturers developing next-generation integrated circuits across logic, memory, RF (radio frequency), analog, and power applications.

In recent weeks, FORM has delivered standout financial performance. The company reported record quarterly revenue of $258.2 million in its most recent quarter, representing a 31.9% year-over-year increase and topping analyst estimates by approximately $18 million. Non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share reached $0.82, beating consensus by $0.21. Gross margins expanded sharply to 53.3% on a non-GAAP basis, driven by higher factory utilization, operational efficiencies, and favorable product mix. Management guided for continued sequential growth, with revenue expected to reach approximately $270 million in the current quarter.

Several factors have supported FORM's momentum. Demand for HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) probe cards has accelerated as AI data centers expand. The company has also strengthened its position in co-packaged optics testing through the strategic acquisition of Keystone Photonics and an expanded partnership with Keystone Microtech in Taiwan. Despite this operational strength, the stock has experienced volatility in recent months. After reaching a 52-week high of $160.27, shares pulled back significantly before rebounding sharply on the latest earnings beat. Analysts maintain a generally constructive but measured outlook, with a "Moderate Buy" consensus and an average price target of approximately $127.45, alongside a recently lowered target from TD Cowen to $100 reflecting near-term caution.

SKYT Overview and Recent Performance

SkyWater Technology, Inc. is the largest exclusively U.S.-based semiconductor foundry, operating as a DMEA (Defense Microelectronics Activity)-accredited Category 1A Trusted Supplier. The company's Technology as a Service (TaaS) model provides customers with development services, high-volume manufacturing, and heterogeneous integration across facilities in Minnesota, Florida, and Texas. SkyWater serves critical domestic markets including aerospace and defense, automotive, biomedical, industrial, and quantum computing.

SkyWater's defining event over the past year has been the acquisition of Infineon's Fab 25 facility in Austin, Texas, completed in mid-2025. This transformative deal was backed by a projected multi-year supply agreement valued at over $1 billion and was expected to double annual revenue and adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization). The integration has meaningfully reshaped SkyWater's financial profile: trailing twelve-month revenue now stands at approximately $541.5 million, with net income of roughly $114 million.

However, the dominant narrative for SKYT in recent months has been its pending acquisition by IonQ. Announced in January 2026, the cash-and-stock deal values SkyWater at approximately $35 per share, or roughly $1.8 billion. SkyWater shareholders approved the merger in May 2026, and final regulatory approval was granted on July 28, 2026, with closing expected on July 31. As a result of the merger, SKYT's stock price has become closely tethered to both the deal terms and IonQ's share price, reducing standalone trading dynamics. The stock has traded in a 52-week range of $8.49 to $39.93, with recent prices hovering near $30–$32, reflecting both the merger premium and broader quantum-sector volatility.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a more systematic approach to navigating markets as dynamic as today's semiconductor sector, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strongest performers—those best aligned with current market conditions—earn a spot in this featured section. These bots employ diverse strategies, from swing trading and trend following to day trading and breakout detection, operating across timeframes as short as 5 minutes and as long as several days. Performance varies widely: top bots in recent periods have generated annualized returns ranging from 34% to over 170%, with some achieving profitable-trade success rates above 90%. Each bot displays transparent statistics including total trades, Sharpe ratios, and win/loss breakdowns. Whether you focus on large-cap stability or small-cap volatility, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify AI-driven strategies that complement your existing investment approach.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental contrast between FORM and SKYT lies in their position within the semiconductor value chain. FormFactor is a toolmaker: it supplies the precision testing equipment that chip manufacturers and foundries need to validate designs and ensure quality. SkyWater is a manufacturer itself: it fabricates semiconductors for customers who need domestic, secure production capacity. This distinction creates very different economic profiles.

On growth drivers, FORM is levered to secular trends in AI, high-performance computing, and advanced packaging. Every new generation of HBM memory, GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), and custom ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) requires more sophisticated testing, directly benefiting FormFactor's probe card business. SKYT's growth story, by contrast, has been anchored in reshoring, defense demand, and now quantum computing via the IonQ merger. The Fab 25 acquisition gave SkyWater immediate scale, while the IonQ deal links its future to the commercialization trajectory of quantum technology.

On financial metrics, the divergence is stark. FORM is solidly profitable with expanding margins and strong free cash flow generation. SKYT, while showing improved profitability after the Fab 25 integration, had been navigating uneven revenue momentum and integration costs prior to the merger announcement. FORM's market capitalization of roughly $8.3 billion dwarfs SKYT's approximately $1.5 billion. On valuation, FORM trades at a premium P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio above 95, reflecting high growth expectations, while SKYT trades at a P/E of approximately 13, though this figure is heavily influenced by the merger terms.

Risk factors also differ. FORM faces exposure to cyclical semiconductor capital spending, geopolitical tariff dynamics, and concentration risk from large customers. SKYT's risk profile is dominated by the pending IonQ merger—any unexpected delay or complication could introduce volatility—as well as reliance on government defense contracts and integration challenges from Fab 25. Sector exposure provides another contrast: FORM benefits broadly across logic, memory, and foundry customers, while SKYT is more tightly focused on U.S.-based defense, aerospace, and emerging quantum applications.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data and trend consistency, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely find a more favorable near-term setup in FORM relative to SKYT. FORM's combination of accelerating revenue growth, expanding gross margins, consistent earnings beats, and upward-trending guidance aligns with what AI models typically identify as a constructive trend structure. The company operates in expanding end markets with clear secular tailwinds and has demonstrated operational momentum across multiple quarters. While FORM's valuation appears elevated by traditional metrics, trend-following AI strategies often prioritize momentum and fundamental improvement over static valuation thresholds.

SKYT presents a more complex picture. The stock is fundamentally in merger-arbitrage territory, with its price determined less by operational momentum and more by deal mechanics and IonQ's share price. For trend-based AI systems that rely on organic price discovery and company-specific catalysts, merger-bound stocks often generate fewer actionable signals. That said, if the IonQ-SkyWater combination unlocks the quantum computing thesis that bulls anticipate, the combined entity could become a compelling candidate for AI-driven strategies over a longer time horizon.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FORM vs. SKYT commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORM is a Hold and SKYT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FORM: $106.20 vs. SKYT: $32.46)
Brand notoriety: FORM and SKYT are both not notable
FORM represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while SKYT is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FORM: 54% vs. SKYT: 198%
Market capitalization -- FORM: $8.28B vs. SKYT: $1.6B
FORM [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $8.28B. SKYT’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $1.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $634.77B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.86T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $62.56B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $176.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FORM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSKYT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FORM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SKYT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKYT is a better buy in the long-term than FORM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FORM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKYT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FORM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SKYT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORM is a better buy in the short-term than SKYT.

Price Growth

FORM (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while SKYT (@Semiconductors) price change was +6.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -21.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

FORM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

SKYT is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-2.84% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-2.82% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FORM($8.28B) has a higher market cap than SKYT($1.6B). FORM has higher P/E ratio than SKYT: FORM (73.24) vs SKYT (13.87). FORM YTD gains are higher at: 90.391 vs. SKYT (78.744). SKYT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 153M vs. FORM (128M). FORM has more cash in the bank: 303M vs. SKYT (22.2M). FORM has less debt than SKYT: FORM (31.9M) vs SKYT (238M). FORM has higher revenues than SKYT: FORM (840M) vs SKYT (542M).
FORMSKYTFORM / SKYT
Capitalization8.28B1.6B518%
EBITDA128M153M84%
Gain YTD90.39178.744115%
P/E Ratio73.2413.87528%
Revenue840M542M155%
Total Cash303M22.2M1,365%
Total Debt31.9M238M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FORM: Fundamental Ratings
FORM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORMSKYT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FORM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SKYT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNSR46.530.71
+1.55%
Global X Internet of Things ETF
FBUF33.020.25
+0.75%
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
RAAX39.46-0.03
-0.08%
VanEck Real Assets ETF
BDBT24.74-0.08
-0.34%
Bluemonte Core Bond ETF
XIDV38.68-0.32
-0.81%
Franklin Intl Div Mltplr Idx ETF

FORM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORM
1D Price
Change %
FORM100%
+0.78%
ONTO - FORM
74%
Closely correlated
+3.22%
RMBS - FORM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
AMAT - FORM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
SLAB - FORM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
ADI - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
More

SKYT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKYT has been loosely correlated with NVMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SKYT jumps, then NVMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKYT
1D Price
Change %
SKYT100%
N/A
NVMI - SKYT
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
FORM - SKYT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
ENTG - SKYT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
KLIC - SKYT
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
LRCX - SKYT
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
More