Ad is loading...
FPCSX vs GMARX
FPCSX vs GMARX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMARX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$39.50
Change+$0.44 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.39B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R
Price$8.20
Change+$0.08 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets829.01M
FPCSX vs GMARX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMARX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and GMARX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.4B vs. GMARX (829M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than GMARX: FPCSX (2.95) vs GMARX (2.46). FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMARX: FPCSX (5 years) vs GMARX (22 years). GMARX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FPCSX (1.02). GMARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (14.00). GMARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMARX (0) vs FPCSX (1500). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. GMARX (-9.40).
| FPCSX | GMARX | FPCSX / GMARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.14 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.14 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.957 | -4.807 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.4B | 829M | 1,255% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.46 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | -9.40 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.99 | -6.22 | -273% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 24.09 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -12.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...