Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs GMARX
FPCSX vs GMARX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMARX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$41.50
Change-$0.09 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.32B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R
Price$8.67
Change-$0.03 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.42M
FPCSX vs GMARX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMARX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and GMARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. GMARX (878M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than GMARX: FPCSX (2.95) vs GMARX (2.46). FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMARX: FPCSX (5 years) vs GMARX (22 years). GMARX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FPCSX (1.02). GMARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). GMARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMARX (0) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.80 vs. GMARX (-5.83).
| FPCSX | GMARX | FPCSX / GMARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.14 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.14 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.106 | 1.641 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 878M | 1,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.46 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | -5.83 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.97 | 6.22 | 466% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 26.40 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -5.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers