Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs NDMSX
FPCSX vs NDMSX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs NDMSX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$45.52
Change+$0.14 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.79B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv Svc
Price$10.09
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets914.52M
FPCSX vs NDMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. NDMSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and NDMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. NDMSX (915M). NDMSX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: NDMSX (2.40) vs FPCSX (1.92). FPCSX was incepted earlier than NDMSX: FPCSX (5 years) vs NDMSX (25 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than NDMSX (0.90). NDMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). NDMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: NDMSX (50000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.18 vs. NDMSX (-0.25). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.04 vs. NDMSX (25.40).
| FPCSX | NDMSX | FPCSX / NDMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.90 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.90 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.051 | 11.785 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 50000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 915M | 1,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.40 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | -0.25 | -4,972% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.11 | 22.97 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.04 | 25.40 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement