Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs NDMSX
FPCSX vs NDMSX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs NDMSX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$44.92
Change+$0.11 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv Svc
Price$9.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.65M
FPCSX vs NDMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. NDMSX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and NDMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. NDMSX (904M). NDMSX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: NDMSX (2.46) vs FPCSX (1.98). FPCSX was incepted earlier than NDMSX: FPCSX (5 years) vs NDMSX (25 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than NDMSX (0.90). NDMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). NDMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: NDMSX (50000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.19 vs. NDMSX (-1.54).
| FPCSX | NDMSX | FPCSX / NDMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.90 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.90 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.631 | 10.195 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 50000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 904M | 1,250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.46 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.19 | -1.54 | -660% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.60 | 16.93 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.07 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement