FRBA
Price
$18.21
Change
+$0.03 (+0.17%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
450.77M
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBFS
Price
$17.36
Change
+$0.24 (+1.40%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
419.88M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRBA vs PBFS

FRBA vs PBFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRBA vs. PBFS commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBA is a Hold and PBFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FRBA: $18.21 vs. PBFS: $17.36)
Brand notoriety: FRBA and PBFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRBA: 189% vs. PBFS: 51%
Market capitalization -- FRBA: $450.77M vs. PBFS: $419.88M
FRBA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $450.77M. PBFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $419.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRBA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePBFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRBA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PBFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRBA is a better buy in the long-term than PBFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRBA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRBA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBFS is a better buy in the short-term than FRBA.

Price Growth

FRBA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.26% price change this week, while PBFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRBA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBA($451M) has a higher market cap than PBFS($420M). PBFS has higher P/E ratio than FRBA: PBFS (24.79) vs FRBA (10.66). PBFS YTD gains are higher at: 28.820 vs. FRBA (12.409). FRBA has higher revenues than PBFS: FRBA (150M) vs PBFS (98.1M).
FRBAPBFSFRBA / PBFS
Capitalization451M420M107%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.40928.82043%
P/E Ratio10.6624.7943%
Revenue150M98.1M153%
Total Cash29.5MN/A-
Total Debt256MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRBA vs PBFS: Fundamental Ratings
FRBA
PBFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5846
SMR RATING
1..100
6174
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4721
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5019

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRBA's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBFS (86) in the null industry. This means that FRBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FRBA (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to FRBA’s over the last 12 months.

FRBA's SMR Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PBFS (74) in the null industry. This means that FRBA’s stock grew similarly to PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FRBA (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to FRBA’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as FRBA (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to FRBA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRBAPBFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRBA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGERX14.050.11
+0.79%
JHancock Global Equity R2
RUSTX18.850.11
+0.59%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity M
JGVVX45.270.20
+0.44%
JPMorgan Growth Advantage R6
ASGTX4.930.01
+0.20%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth A
PHRCX21.03-0.04
-0.19%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs C

PBFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBFS has been loosely correlated with ALRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBFS jumps, then ALRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBFS
1D Price
Change %
PBFS100%
+1.43%
ALRS - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
SBSI - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
FRBA - PBFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
MBWM - PBFS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
FDBC - PBFS
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
More