FRD
Price
$39.34
Change
-$0.13 (-0.33%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
284.69M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSB
Price
$19.12
Change
-$0.27 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
254.4M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRD vs MSB

FRD vs MSB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRD vs. MSB commentary
Sep 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRD is a Buy and MSB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRD vs MSB: Fundamental Ratings
FRD
MSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6078
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
5031
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3783
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
882
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSB's Valuation (8) in the Steel industry is in the same range as FRD (27) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew similarly to FRD’s over the last 12 months.

FRD's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSB (100) in the Steel industry. This means that FRD’s stock grew significantly faster than MSB’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's SMR Rating (31) in the Steel industry is in the same range as FRD (50) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew similarly to FRD’s over the last 12 months.

FRD's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSB (83) in the Steel industry. This means that FRD’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSB’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRD (88) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew significantly faster than FRD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRDMSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2026
Stock price -- (FRD: $39.47 vs. MSB: $19.39)
Brand notoriety: FRD and MSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRD: 34% vs. MSB: 123%
Market capitalization -- FRD: $284.69M vs. MSB: $254.4M
FRD [@Steel] is valued at $284.69M. MSB’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $254.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $5K to $56.26B. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $10.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MSB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRD is a better buy in the long-term than MSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MSB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSB is a better buy in the short-term than FRD.

Price Growth

FRD (@Steel) experienced а -5.53% price change this week, while MSB (@Steel) price change was -2.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +5.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+5.27% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FRD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWZS13.150.11
+0.84%
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS)
IBDZ24.860.09
+0.36%
iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF (IBDZ)
LQDI25.040.03
+0.14%
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI)
VBK341.360.22
+0.06%
Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK)
AVXX24.37-2.13
-8.03%
Defiance Daily Target 2x Long AVAV ETF (AVXX)

FRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRD and WS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRD and WS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRD
1D Price
Change %
FRD100%
-0.33%
WS - FRD
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
TX - FRD
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
IIIN - FRD
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
STLD - FRD
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
INHD - FRD
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
More

MSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSB and CMC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSB and CMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSB
1D Price
Change %
MSB100%
-1.39%
CMC - MSB
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
FRD - MSB
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
CLF - MSB
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
ASTL - MSB
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
TX - MSB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More