FRGT
Price
$4.01
Change
+$0.03 (+0.75%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PDFS
Price
$63.01
Change
-$5.66 (-8.24%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.64B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRGT vs PDFS

FRGT vs PDFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRGT vs. PDFS commentary
Jun 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGT is a StrongBuy and PDFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2026
Stock price -- (FRGT: $4.01 vs. PDFS: $63.01)
Brand notoriety: FRGT and PDFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRGT: 10% vs. PDFS: 182%
Market capitalization -- FRGT: $2.29M vs. PDFS: $2.64B
FRGT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.29M. PDFS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePDFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PDFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PDFS is a better buy in the long-term than FRGT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRGT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDFS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRGT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PDFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRGT is a better buy in the short-term than PDFS.

Price Growth

FRGT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.25% price change this week, while PDFS (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

PDFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDFS($2.64B) has a higher market cap than FRGT($2.29M). PDFS has higher P/E ratio than FRGT: PDFS (360.83) vs FRGT (0.01). PDFS YTD gains are higher at: 120.855 vs. FRGT (-52.262). PDFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30M vs. FRGT (-4.22M). FRGT has less debt than PDFS: FRGT (3.26M) vs PDFS (72M). PDFS has higher revenues than FRGT: PDFS (231M) vs FRGT (13.3M).
FRGTPDFSFRGT / PDFS
Capitalization2.29M2.64B0%
EBITDA-4.22M30M-14%
Gain YTD-52.262120.855-43%
P/E Ratio0.01360.830%
Revenue13.3M231M6%
Total CashN/A31.2M-
Total Debt3.26M72M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRGT vs PDFS: Fundamental Ratings
FRGT
PDFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
287
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
9989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRGT's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDFS (94) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FRGT’s stock grew significantly faster than PDFS’s over the last 12 months.

PDFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

PDFS's SMR Rating (89) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as FRGT (99) in the null industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

PDFS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (89) in the null industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

PDFS's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRGTPDFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PDFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSCZ20.530.03
+0.14%
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corp Bd ETF
CLOA51.920.01
+0.02%
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF
URNJ23.30-0.05
-0.21%
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
FCTR39.96-0.27
-0.67%
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
CVNY20.37-1.21
-5.61%
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF

FRGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRGT has been closely correlated with YAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRGT jumps, then YAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRGT
1D Price
Change %
FRGT100%
+0.75%
YAAS - FRGT
81%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
FTFT - FRGT
73%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
BVC - FRGT
65%
Loosely correlated
+7.47%
IMMR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.09%
PDFS - FRGT
28%
Poorly correlated
-8.24%
More

PDFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDFS has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDFS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDFS
1D Price
Change %
PDFS100%
-8.24%
SNPS - PDFS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
S - PDFS
51%
Loosely correlated
+6.35%
MSFT - PDFS
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.71%
FFIV - PDFS
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
NTCT - PDFS
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
More