Ad is loading...
FRGT
Price
$1.36
Change
-$0.08 (-5.56%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
UBSFF
Price
$14.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

FRGT vs UBSFF

Header iconFRGT vs UBSFF Comparison
Open Charts FRGT vs UBSFFBanner chart's image
Freight Technologies
Price$1.36
Change-$0.08 (-5.56%)
Volume$71.95K
CapitalizationN/A
UbiSoft Entertainment
Price$14.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$177
CapitalizationN/A
FRGT vs UBSFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRGT vs. UBSFF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGT is a Sell and UBSFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FRGT: $1.36 vs. UBSFF: $14.10)
Brand notoriety: FRGT and UBSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRGT: 11% vs. UBSFF: 3%
Market capitalization -- FRGT: $3.05M vs. UBSFF: $4.21B
FRGT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.05M. UBSFF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UBSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRGT is a better buy in the long-term than UBSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRGT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRGT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FRGT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -20.00% price change this week, while UBSFF (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRGT is expected to report earnings on May 31, 2023.

UBSFF is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSFF($4.21B) has a higher market cap than FRGT($3.05M). UBSFF YTD gains are higher at: -44.488 vs. FRGT (-98.381). UBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 899M vs. FRGT (-7.91M). UBSFF has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. FRGT (3.15M). FRGT has less debt than UBSFF: FRGT (4.49M) vs UBSFF (2.2B). UBSFF has higher revenues than FRGT: UBSFF (2.11B) vs FRGT (24.6M).
FRGTUBSFFFRGT / UBSFF
Capitalization3.05M4.21B0%
EBITDA-7.91M899M-1%
Gain YTD-98.381-44.488221%
P/E RatioN/A40.32-
Revenue24.6M2.11B1%
Total Cash3.15M1.53B0%
Total Debt4.49M2.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRGT vs UBSFF: Fundamental Ratings
FRGT
UBSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9784
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRGT's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBSFF (57). This means that FRGT’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

FRGT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UBSFF (100). This means that FRGT’s stock grew similarly to UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

UBSFF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (99). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

UBSFF's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (97). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

UBSFF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (100). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TANH0.16N/A
-0.69%
Tantech Holdings Ltd
QGEN41.27-0.82
-1.95%
Qiagen NV
NEON6.13-0.13
-2.08%
Neonode
TR31.86-0.77
-2.36%
Tootsie Roll Industries
KE19.09-0.56
-2.85%
Kimball Electronics

FRGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRGT has been loosely correlated with SDGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRGT jumps, then SDGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRGT
1D Price
Change %
FRGT100%
-5.56%
SDGR - FRGT
38%
Loosely correlated
-8.98%
IMMR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
DOCN - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.91%
XROLF - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
PRCH - FRGT
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.18%
More

UBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBSFF and MTHRY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBSFF and MTHRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBSFF
1D Price
Change %
UBSFF100%
N/A
MTHRY - UBSFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
GXAI - UBSFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-19.89%
FRGT - UBSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
THQQF - UBSFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRTC - UBSFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More