FRGT
Price
$1.45
Change
+$0.06 (+4.32%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.99M
XROLF
Price
$103.81
Change
-$4.19 (-3.88%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
17.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRGT vs XROLF

Header iconFRGT vs XROLF Comparison
Open Charts FRGT vs XROLFBanner chart's image
Freight Technologies
Price$1.45
Change+$0.06 (+4.32%)
Volume$169.74K
Capitalization3.99M
Xero
Price$103.81
Change-$4.19 (-3.88%)
Volume$125
Capitalization17.51B
FRGT vs XROLF Comparison Chart in %
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XROLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRGT vs. XROLF commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGT is a StrongBuy and XROLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FRGT: $1.45 vs. XROLF: $103.81)
Brand notoriety: FRGT and XROLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRGT: 19% vs. XROLF: 51%
Market capitalization -- FRGT: $3.99M vs. XROLF: $17.51B
FRGT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.99M. XROLF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $17.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $314.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXROLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XROLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRGT is a better buy in the long-term than XROLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRGT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XROLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRGT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XROLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRGT is a better buy in the short-term than XROLF.

Price Growth

FRGT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +15.08% price change this week, while XROLF (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +217.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.89% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XROLF($17.5B) has a higher market cap than FRGT($3.99M). XROLF has higher P/E ratio than FRGT: XROLF (117.74) vs FRGT (0.04). XROLF YTD gains are higher at: -2.109 vs. FRGT (-80.820). XROLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 697M vs. FRGT (-1.26M). XROLF has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. FRGT (587K). FRGT has less debt than XROLF: FRGT (5.35M) vs XROLF (1.22B). XROLF has higher revenues than FRGT: XROLF (1.91B) vs FRGT (12.7M).
FRGTXROLFFRGT / XROLF
Capitalization3.99M17.5B0%
EBITDA-1.26M697M-0%
Gain YTD-80.820-2.1093,832%
P/E Ratio0.04117.740%
Revenue12.7M1.91B1%
Total Cash587K2.12B0%
Total Debt5.35M1.22B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRGT vs XROLF: Fundamental Ratings
FRGT
XROLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3132
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9772
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRGT's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XROLF (83). This means that FRGT’s stock grew somewhat faster than XROLF’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (100). This means that XROLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (97). This means that XROLF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (65). This means that XROLF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (100). This means that XROLF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRGTXROLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XROLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLUX4.901.17
+31.37%
Flux Power Holdings
DGLY2.070.04
+1.97%
Digital Ally Inc New
SF113.261.84
+1.65%
Stifel Financial Corp
DDI9.240.07
+0.76%
DoubleDown Interactive Co Ltd
TSLX22.25-0.06
-0.27%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending

FRGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRGT and IMMR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRGT and IMMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRGT
1D Price
Change %
FRGT100%
+4.32%
IMMR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
TTWO - FRGT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
XROLF - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMR - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
PRCH - FRGT
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
More

XROLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XROLF and FRGT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XROLF and FRGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XROLF
1D Price
Change %
XROLF100%
N/A
FRGT - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.32%
ATEN - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
NEOJF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRYBF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.90%
XBP - XROLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
More