Ad is loading...
FRGT
Price
$1.36
Change
-$0.08 (-5.56%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
XROLF
Price
$107.85
Change
+$2.25 (+2.13%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

FRGT vs XROLF

Header iconFRGT vs XROLF Comparison
Open Charts FRGT vs XROLFBanner chart's image
Freight Technologies
Price$1.36
Change-$0.08 (-5.56%)
Volume$71.95K
CapitalizationN/A
Xero
Price$107.85
Change+$2.25 (+2.13%)
Volume$210
CapitalizationN/A
FRGT vs XROLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRGT vs. XROLF commentary
Nov 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGT is a Sell and XROLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 17, 2024
Stock price -- (FRGT: $1.36 vs. XROLF: $107.85)
Brand notoriety: FRGT and XROLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRGT: 11% vs. XROLF: 38%
Market capitalization -- FRGT: $3.05M vs. XROLF: $12.55B
FRGT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.05M. XROLF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $12.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXROLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XROLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XROLF is a better buy in the long-term than FRGT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRGT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRGT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FRGT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -20.00% price change this week, while XROLF (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRGT is expected to report earnings on May 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XROLF($12.5B) has a higher market cap than FRGT($3.05M). XROLF YTD gains are higher at: 43.418 vs. FRGT (-98.381). XROLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 168M vs. FRGT (-7.91M). XROLF has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. FRGT (3.15M). FRGT has less debt than XROLF: FRGT (4.49M) vs XROLF (1.07B). XROLF has higher revenues than FRGT: XROLF (1.31B) vs FRGT (24.6M).
FRGTXROLFFRGT / XROLF
Capitalization3.05M12.5B0%
EBITDA-7.91M168M-5%
Gain YTD-98.38143.418-227%
P/E RatioN/A1250.00-
Revenue24.6M1.31B2%
Total Cash3.15M1.05B0%
Total Debt4.49M1.07B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRGT vs XROLF: Fundamental Ratings
FRGT
XROLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10040
SMR RATING
1..100
9949
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10055
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8544

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRGT's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XROLF (85). This means that FRGT’s stock grew somewhat faster than XROLF’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (100). This means that XROLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (99). This means that XROLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (97). This means that XROLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (100). This means that XROLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCCAX6.400.07
+1.11%
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Foc A
DFUVX33.44-0.16
-0.48%
DFA US Large Cap Value III
MIEDX8.41-0.06
-0.71%
MassMutual International Eq R5
AQGRX11.95-0.11
-0.91%
AQR Global Equity R6
ANWPX64.56-0.93
-1.42%
American Funds New Perspective A

FRGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRGT has been loosely correlated with SDGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRGT jumps, then SDGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRGT
1D Price
Change %
FRGT100%
-5.56%
SDGR - FRGT
38%
Loosely correlated
-8.98%
IMMR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
DOCN - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.91%
XROLF - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
PRCH - FRGT
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.18%
More

XROLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XROLF and FRGT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XROLF and FRGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XROLF
1D Price
Change %
XROLF100%
+2.13%
FRGT - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
ATEN - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
LIFW - XROLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-20.87%
NEOJF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRYBF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More