FRI vs USRT

Key Takeaways

• Both FRI and USRT are passively managed U.S. REIT (real estate investment trust) ETFs that hold many of the same large-cap names, making them near-direct competitors for the same investor goal.
• Cost is the decisive structural difference: USRT carries a 0.08% expense ratio versus 0.50% for FRI, a gap that compounds into a meaningful performance drag over time.
• Liquidity and scale favor USRT: with roughly $4.3 billion in assets versus around $180 million for FRI, USRT offers tighter spreads and deeper secondary-market trading.
• Both funds are market-cap-weighted and concentrated in the same top holdings, led by WELL, PLD, and EQIX, so exposure differences are minor rather than structural.
• Tickeron AI Verdict: USRT is the preferred ticker, driven by materially lower costs, greater liquidity, and comparable diversification.

Introduction

For investors seeking broad, income-oriented exposure to U.S. listed real estate, FRI and USRT are two of the most directly comparable vehicles available. Both are plain-vanilla, passively managed ETFs tracking market-capitalization-weighted indexes of U.S. equity REITs, and both deliver near-identical top holdings and sector tilts. This makes the comparison especially relevant right now: because the funds largely overlap, the practical choice often comes down to cost, liquidity, and minor index-construction nuances rather than dramatic differences in what each fund owns. Understanding those structural distinctions helps investors decide which wrapper best serves their real estate allocation.

First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI) Overview

FRI seeks to track the S&P United States REIT Index, a market-cap-weighted benchmark of publicly traded U.S. REITs. Launched in 2007 by First Trust, the fund normally invests at least 90% of its net assets in index securities. It holds roughly 126 to 136 positions and carries a net expense ratio of 0.50%. Its top holdings are concentrated in large-cap REIT leaders, including WELL, PLD, EQIX, SPG, and DLR. The portfolio is effectively 100% real estate, spanning specialized, health care, retail, residential, and industrial REITs. As a passive, market-cap-weighted fund, its distinguishing characteristics are its broad REIT coverage and its comparatively higher fee relative to larger peers.

iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) Overview

USRT seeks to track the FTSE Nareit Equity REITs 40 Act Capped Index, a diversified market-cap-weighted index of U.S.-listed equity REITs that excludes mortgage, timber, and infrastructure REITs. Managed by BlackRock's iShares, the fund holds roughly 126 to 136 positions and charges a low 0.08% expense ratio. Its largest holdings mirror FRI's lineup: WELL, PLD, EQIX, SPG, and DLR, alongside PSA and O. By industry, its exposure skews toward specialized REITs (roughly 27%), health care (about 18%), retail (about 17%), and residential (about 15%). Its defining features are scale, deep liquidity, and a notably lean cost structure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within a U.S. REIT market heavily influenced by interest rate expectations, because REITs rely on debt financing and are often valued relative to bond yields. When borrowing costs ease, real estate valuations and capital flows into the sector generally improve; when yields stay elevated, income-oriented REITs can face valuation pressure. Beyond rates, the sector is being reshaped by structural demand shifts: data-center and specialized REITs such as EQIX and DLR benefit from AI and cloud-driven digital infrastructure growth, while health care REITs tied to aging demographics have shown relative resilience. Retail and office exposures remain the most cyclical and sensitive to economic conditions. Both funds carry concentrated large-cap exposure to these same catalysts and risks.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Because FRI and USRT hold nearly identical top positions, their performance has tracked closely in recent weeks and across recent market cycles, with relative returns dominated by the cost differential rather than divergent stock selection. Over multi-year periods, the 0.50% fee on FRI versus 0.08% on USRT creates a persistent drag that widens the gap in USRT's favor as holding periods lengthen. Volatility profiles are similar, though USRT's deeper liquidity tends to support tighter bid-ask spreads during market stress. Both funds respond to the same macro drivers — interest rate pivots, earnings cycles among top holdings, and rotation between growth and income segments — meaning the practical decision leans on efficiency and scale rather than materially different positioning.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps surface trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF and equity research with data-driven precision.

Tickeron AI Verdict

On observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor USRT. The two funds offer nearly interchangeable REIT exposure, but USRT delivers a materially lower expense ratio (0.08% versus 0.50%), substantially greater assets under management (AUM) and trading liquidity, and comparable diversification. These advantages support superior long-term cost efficiency and more robust execution in volatile markets, with no meaningful sacrifice in sector coverage or holdings quality. Accordingly, USRT appears the more efficient wrapper for broadly similar exposure, though the conclusion is probabilistic and based on structure rather than a forecast of future returns.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations