Advertisement
FRMM vs PHUN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMM is a Hold and PHUN is a Hold.
| FRMM | PHUN | FRMM / PHUN | |
| Capitalization | 60.1M | 41.7M | 144% |
| EBITDA | -525.88M | -12.96M | 4,058% |
| Gain YTD | -6.735 | 9.730 | -69% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 10.8M | 2.75M | 393% |
| Total Cash | 4.1M | 92.1M | 4% |
| Total Debt | 26M | 453K | 5,740% |
FRMM | PHUN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PHUN's Valuation (41) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRMM (76) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that PHUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRMM’s over the last 12 months.
PHUN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRMM (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that PHUN’s stock grew similarly to FRMM’s over the last 12 months.
PHUN's SMR Rating (94) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRMM (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that PHUN’s stock grew similarly to FRMM’s over the last 12 months.
FRMM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PHUN (55) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRMM’s stock grew similarly to PHUN’s over the last 12 months.
FRMM's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as PHUN (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRMM’s stock grew similarly to PHUN’s over the last 12 months.
| FRMM | PHUN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRMM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PHUN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRMM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PHUN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRMM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHUN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRMM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PHUN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FRMM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -13.94% price change this week, while PHUN (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRMM is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2026.
PHUN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
FRMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRMM has been loosely correlated with WVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRMM jumps, then WVE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRMM | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| WVE - FRMM | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| PRQR - FRMM | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| PHUN - FRMM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| JSPR - FRMM | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.77% | ||
| MSTR - FRMM | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||