Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs PNRCX
FRNRX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs PNRCX
FRNRX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. PNRCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and PNRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNRCX has more cash in the bank: 955M vs. FRNRX (510M). FRNRX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FRNRX (1.38) vs PNRCX (0.62). FRNRX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FRNRX (31 years) vs PNRCX (32 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). PNRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX (1000) and PNRCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PNRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.61 vs. FRNRX (44.28). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 113.13 vs. PNRCX (92.31).
| FRNRX | PNRCX | FRNRX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.03 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.03 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.697 | 17.366 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 955M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.62 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.28 | 46.61 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.68 | 69.49 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.13 | 92.31 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.98 | 154.35 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers