Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSGX vs FSMAX
FRSGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FRSGX vs FSMAX
FRSGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. FRSGX (3.36B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FRSGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs FRSGX (0.00). FRSGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FRSGX (35 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FRSGX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FRSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.96 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSGX: FSMAX (0) vs FRSGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.88 vs. FRSGX (-8.28). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.75 vs. FRSGX (-28.58).
| FRSGX | FSMAX | FRSGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.601 | 14.205 | 25% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.36B | 40.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.28 | 13.88 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.07 | 65.12 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.58 | 33.75 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.14 | 135.14 | 11% |