Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSGX vs FSMAX
FRSGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FRSGX vs FSMAX
FRSGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. FRSGX (3.66B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FRSGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FRSGX (0.00). FRSGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FRSGX (34 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FRSGX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FRSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.86 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSGX: FSMAX (0) vs FRSGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. FRSGX (2.04). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. FRSGX (-15.07).
| FRSGX | FSMAX | FRSGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.04 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.04 | 2,429% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.525 | 13.668 | 55% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 42.7B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 30.51 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.27 | 71.53 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.07 | 37.00 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.21 | 141.36 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers