FRSX
Price
$0.89
Change
-$0.05 (-5.32%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
15.82M
MNRO
Price
$18.71
Change
-$0.50 (-2.60%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
915.6M
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRSX vs MNRO

Header iconFRSX vs MNRO Comparison
Open Charts FRSX vs MNROBanner chart's image
Foresight Autonomous Holdings
Price$0.89
Change-$0.05 (-5.32%)
Volume$119.51K
Capitalization15.82M
Monro
Price$18.71
Change-$0.50 (-2.60%)
Volume$741.27K
Capitalization915.6M
FRSX vs MNRO Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRSX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSX vs. MNRO commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSX is a Hold and MNRO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSX: $0.89 vs. MNRO: $18.71)
Brand notoriety: FRSX and MNRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSX: 12% vs. MNRO: 97%
Market capitalization -- FRSX: $15.82M vs. MNRO: $915.6M
FRSX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $15.82M. MNRO’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $915.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRSX and MNRO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNRO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNRO is a better buy in the short-term than FRSX.

Price Growth

FRSX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -6.89% price change this week, while MNRO (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -5.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSX is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2023.

MNRO is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.21% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNRO($916M) has a higher market cap than FRSX($15.8M). MNRO YTD gains are higher at: -24.556 vs. FRSX (-39.601). MNRO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 141M vs. FRSX (-17.59M). MNRO has more cash in the bank: 23.8M vs. FRSX (17.7M). FRSX has less debt than MNRO: FRSX (1.83M) vs MNRO (616M). MNRO has higher revenues than FRSX: MNRO (1.28B) vs FRSX (357K).
FRSXMNROFRSX / MNRO
Capitalization15.8M916M2%
EBITDA-17.59M141M-12%
Gain YTD-39.601-24.556161%
P/E RatioN/A28.35-
Revenue357K1.28B0%
Total Cash17.7M23.8M74%
Total Debt1.83M616M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSX vs MNRO: Fundamental Ratings
FRSX
MNRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
625
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9885
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5488
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNRO's Valuation (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FRSX (9) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to FRSX’s over the last 12 months.

MNRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FRSX (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to FRSX’s over the last 12 months.

MNRO's SMR Rating (85) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FRSX (98) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to FRSX’s over the last 12 months.

FRSX's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRO (88) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FRSX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

MNRO's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSX (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSXMNRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRSX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYCAX38.44N/A
N/A
Rydex Consumer Products H
SLCCX40.54N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth C
TINGX25.23-0.16
-0.63%
Thornburg International Growth I
JIIGX78.33-1.60
-2.00%
JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders R6
MNDBX14.96-0.44
-2.86%
MFS New Discovery B

FRSX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRSX and CREV have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRSX and CREV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSX
1D Price
Change %
FRSX100%
-4.90%
CREV - FRSX
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
SYPR - FRSX
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.46%
LIDR - FRSX
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.48%
MNRO - FRSX
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
MLR - FRSX
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
More

MNRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNRO has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNRO jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRO
1D Price
Change %
MNRO100%
-2.60%
BWA - MNRO
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
AXL - MNRO
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.76%
THRM - MNRO
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
MGA - MNRO
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
LIMAF - MNRO
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
More