FRT
Price
$125.84
Change
+$1.12 (+0.90%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
10.87B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KRG
Price
$29.22
Change
+$0.18 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.93B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs KRG

Header iconFRT vs KRG Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs KRGBanner chart's image
FRT vs KRG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) vs. Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FRT boasts a larger market capitalization of approximately $9.66 billion compared to KRG's $5.30 billion, indicating greater scale and stability.
  • Both are retail Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), but KRG has delivered stronger 52-week gains of about 21%, outperforming FRT's year-to-date rise of 13.4%.
  • Dividend yields are attractive for income-focused investors, with KRG at 4.44% and FRT at 4.04%, alongside solid payout ratios.
  • Recent momentum favors KRG near its 52-week high, while FRT benefits from its S&P 500 status and longest REIT dividend growth streak.
  • Valuations show KRG with a lower trailing P/E of 19.06 versus FRT's 23.89, suggesting relative value.
  • Upcoming Q1 2026 earnings for both could drive sentiment, with analyst focus on funds from operations (FFO) growth.

Introduction

This stock comparison pits two prominent retail REITs, FRT and KRG, against each other in the current market environment. Both companies own and operate high-quality shopping centers amid resilient consumer spending and e-commerce integration trends. Investors seeking income through dividends, growth via property redevelopment, or sector exposure to retail real estate will find value in evaluating their relative performance, valuations, and catalysts. With interest rate dynamics influencing REIT pricing, this analysis highlights key contrasts in scale, momentum, and positioning.

FRT Overview and Recent Performance

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is a leading S&P 500 REIT specializing in premium retail-based properties, including open-air centers and mixed-use developments in affluent coastal markets. Its portfolio spans 104 properties with 28.8 million square feet of commercial space and residential units. In recent market activity, FRT shares have traded near the upper end of their 52-week range ($89.99–$113.09), reflecting year-to-date gains of 13.4% and a current price around $111.83. Sentiment has been bolstered by strategic acquisitions like Congressional North and its unmatched 58-year dividend increase streak, the longest among REITs. Upcoming Q1 2026 earnings on May 1, with projected FFO growth, underscore steady operational resilience amid retail sector recovery.

KRG Overview and Recent Performance

Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) focuses on open-air shopping centers and mixed-use assets nationwide, emphasizing grocery-anchored properties for stable tenancy. With a market cap of $5.30 billion, it maintains a concentrated, high-quality portfolio. Recent weeks have seen KRG shares hover near 52-week highs around $26, supported by 21% 52-week appreciation and a beta of 0.88 indicating lower volatility. Key drivers include $474 million in dispositions to optimize the portfolio and leadership promotions enhancing operational efficiency. Q1 2026 results anticipation, alongside robust leasing, has fueled positive momentum despite short-term fluctuations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles—from swing trading to long-term holds. Only 25 bots earn a spot in this elite section based on suitability for prevailing market conditions, often displaying strong win rates, profit factors above 1.5, and controlled drawdowns under 20% in backtests. These bots adapt to volatility, momentum shifts, and sector rotations, offering automated signals for stocks like REITs. Traders can explore performance stats, historical returns, and copy trading options to align with their risk profiles. Visit the Trending AI Robots page for real-time insights.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both FRT and KRG operate in the retail REIT space, but FRT differentiates through upscale mixed-use developments in high-demand demographics, driving premium rents, while KRG prioritizes grocery-anchored centers for defensive occupancy. Growth drivers include FRT's redevelopment expertise versus KRG's portfolio recycling via dispositions. Recent momentum tilts to KRG with superior 52-week returns, though FRT offers S&P 500 liquidity. Risk factors show KRG's lower beta and P/E, but FRT's scale mitigates interest rate sensitivity. Market sentiment remains constructive for both amid retail resilience, with trade-offs in yield versus stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward FRT with moderate conviction, citing its superior trend consistency, dividend reliability, and positioning in premium assets amid economic uncertainty. While KRG exhibits stronger short-term momentum, FRT's larger scale and historical stability suggest higher probability of sustained outperformance in varied conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FRT vs. KRG commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Buy and KRG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FRT: $125.84 vs. KRG: $29.22)
Brand notoriety: FRT and KRG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 83% vs. KRG: 173%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $10.87B vs. KRG: $5.93B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $10.87B. KRG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $5.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKRG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KRG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KRG is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KRG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRT and KRG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.68% price change this week, while KRG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +5.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

KRG is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+3.49% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($10.9B) has a higher market cap than KRG($5.93B). KRG (22.14) and FRT (21.81) have similar P/E ratio . FRT YTD gains are higher at: 27.614 vs. KRG (25.566). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.09B vs. KRG (790M). FRT has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. KRG (32.5M). KRG has less debt than FRT: KRG (2.99B) vs FRT (4.93B). FRT has higher revenues than KRG: FRT (1.31B) vs KRG (824M).
FRTKRGFRT / KRG
Capitalization10.9B5.93B184%
EBITDA1.09B790M138%
Gain YTD27.61425.566108%
P/E Ratio21.8122.1499%
Revenue1.31B824M159%
Total Cash116M32.5M357%
Total Debt4.93B2.99B165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs KRG: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
KRG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2344
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5428
SMR RATING
1..100
5475
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KRG's Valuation (31) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (63). This means that KRG’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

KRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (54). This means that KRG’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KRG (75). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KRG’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KRG (42). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KRG’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KRG (100). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KRG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTKRG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ION58.442.33
+4.15%
ProShares S&P Global Cor Btty Mtls ETF
IWD242.132.35
+0.98%
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
EDF5.620.04
+0.72%
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
KMAY29.990.13
+0.44%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -May
BUFF52.310.05
+0.10%
Innovator Laddered Allc Pwr Bfr ETF™

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with AKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then AKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+0.90%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
KRG - FRT
81%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
REG - FRT
78%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
SPG - FRT
77%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
UDR - FRT
77%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
More