FRT
Price
$118.39
Change
-$0.50 (-0.42%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
10.29B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KRG
Price
$26.45
Change
-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.3B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs KRG

FRT vs KRG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) vs. Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FRT and KRG are both retail-focused REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts), but they target fundamentally different markets: FRT concentrates on affluent coastal metros, while KRG is anchored in high-growth Sun Belt markets.
  • FRT commands a premium valuation with a market cap of approximately $10.8 billion, nearly double KRG's roughly $5.7 billion, reflecting its S&P 500 membership and industry-leading 58-year dividend growth streak.
  • KRG offers a higher dividend yield of approximately 4.1% compared to FRT's 3.6%, but FRT's payout is backed by stronger, more consistent earnings and a fortress-like balance sheet.
  • Both stocks have delivered strong year-to-date returns above 27%, but FRT has shown greater revenue momentum and earnings consistency in recent quarters.
  • FRT recently appointed a Senior Vice President of Digital Innovation to drive AI adoption across its operations, signaling a forward-looking strategic edge that KRG has not matched.
  • KRG's active portfolio repositioning — selling approximately $600 million in lower-growth assets — has improved its embedded rent growth but introduces near-term execution risk.

Introduction

Comparing FRT and KRG offers investors a window into two distinct philosophies within the retail REIT space. Federal Realty Investment Trust represents a blue-chip, coastal-focused operator with a multi-decade track record of dividend reliability and premium portfolio quality. Kite Realty Group Trust, by contrast, is a Sun Belt-centric, grocery-anchored retail landlord that has spent recent years aggressively reshaping its asset base. For income-oriented investors, dividend-growth seekers, and those gauging relative value in the shopping center REIT sector, this head-to-head comparison illuminates the trade-offs between quality and yield, stability and repositioning potential, and coastal affluence versus Sun Belt demographic momentum.

FRT Overview and Recent Performance

Federal Realty Investment Trust, founded in 1962 and headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, is widely regarded as one of the premier retail REITs in the United States. Its portfolio comprises 104 properties spanning approximately 29 million commercial square feet and roughly 2,500 residential units, with flagship mixed-use destinations such as Santana Row in San Jose, Pike & Rose in Maryland, and Assembly Row in Massachusetts. The trust focuses on high-barrier-to-entry coastal markets — primarily the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, California, and South Florida — where affluent demographics support sustained retailer demand and above-average rent growth.

In recent market activity, FRT has demonstrated notable momentum. The stock has risen approximately 29% year-to-date and roughly 39% over the trailing twelve months, buoyed by record leasing volumes and strong rent spreads. During the fourth quarter of 2025, FRT reported comparable portfolio occupancy of 94.5% and signed leases reflecting a 12% cash rent increase on comparable spaces. First-quarter 2026 earnings per share came in at $1.81, significantly surpassing consensus estimates, while revenue reached $341 million. The trust raised its full-year 2026 core FFO (Funds From Operations, a key REIT earnings metric) guidance to a range of $7.42 to $7.52 per share. A newly created Senior Vice President of Digital Innovation role, filled by an AI and proptech veteran, underscores management's commitment to leveraging technology across leasing, operations, and investment. Analysts from Wolfe Research, Piper Sandler, and Mizuho have recently assigned or reiterated Outperform-equivalent ratings, citing limited retail supply and a new growth cycle.

KRG Overview and Recent Performance

Kite Realty Group Trust, headquartered in Indianapolis and publicly listed since 2004, owns and operates 169 open-air shopping centers and mixed-use assets totaling approximately 27.3 million square feet of gross leasable area. The portfolio is concentrated in the Sun Belt and select strategic gateway markets, with a heavy emphasis on grocery-anchored neighborhood and community centers. This positioning ties KRG's fortunes to population migration trends toward the Southeast and Southwest, where demographic tailwinds remain favorable.

KRG's recent stock performance has been robust, with a year-to-date gain of approximately 27% and a trailing one-year return of roughly 35%. However, underlying financial results paint a more nuanced picture. First-quarter 2026 revenue of $200.7 million represented a 9.2% decline year-over-year, and net income fell to $11.4 million from $23.7 million in the same period a year earlier. The company has undertaken a significant portfolio repositioning, selling about $600 million of lower-growth properties over the past two years while repurchasing $400 million of its own stock. Management reported that embedded rent growth has improved from 156 basis points to 182 basis points as a result. In July 2026, KRG closed a $345 million offering of 3.25% exchangeable senior notes due 2032, using proceeds in part to retire higher-cost 4.00% notes and to fund share repurchases. The consensus analyst rating on KRG is Hold, with an average price target near $28.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like FRT and KRG, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across various timeframes, strategies, and risk profiles. Only the strongest performers — those demonstrating the most consistent signals and adaptability to prevailing market dynamics — earn a place in this trending section. These bots employ diverse trading styles, from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend-following, with performance statistics that include win rates, Sharpe ratios, and drawdown metrics. The curated list helps traders cut through the noise and identify the AI strategies that are currently most aligned with market realities. Explore the Trending AI Robots to discover which automated strategies may complement your investment process.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Market Focus and Geographic Strategy. FRT targets affluent coastal metros with limited new retail supply, commanding average base rents above $40 per square foot and attracting premium national tenants. KRG focuses on Sun Belt markets where population growth is faster but barriers to entry are lower, and its grocery-anchored centers serve necessity-based retail demand. FRT's tenant diversification is exceptional — its largest tenant accounts for just 2.6% of annualized base rent — while KRG's portfolio breadth (169 properties versus FRT's 104) offers its own form of risk dispersion.

Financial Strength and Dividend Reliability. FRT holds a clear advantage in balance sheet quality and dividend consistency. With 58 consecutive years of dividend increases — the longest streak in the REIT industry — and a fixed charge coverage ratio that improved to 4.2 times in recent quarters, FRT offers near-unmatched income reliability. KRG's 4.1% dividend yield outpaces FRT's 3.6%, but its payout ratio is higher at approximately 87%, and its earnings history has been considerably more volatile. FRT's net debt to market capitalization of roughly 34% also compares favorably to KRG's leverage profile.

Growth Trajectory and Catalysts. FRT's growth playbook centers on organic rent growth from irreplaceable locations, strategic acquisitions, and mixed-use redevelopment. The recent AI-focused executive hire signals a commitment to operational innovation that could widen its competitive moat. KRG's growth story is rooted in capital recycling — selling weaker assets and redeploying proceeds into higher-quality properties and share buybacks. While this strategy has improved embedded rent growth metrics, it also introduces execution risk and makes near-term earnings somewhat less predictable.

Valuation and Market Sentiment. FRT trades at a premium, with a P/E ratio of approximately 21.7 and a price-to-book near 2.6, reflecting its blue-chip status. KRG trades at a similar P/E of approximately 21.3 but a lower price-to-book of roughly 2.0, suggesting relative value. However, analyst sentiment skews more favorably toward FRT, with a consensus Moderate Buy rating and multiple price target increases in recent weeks, compared to KRG's consensus Hold.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, balance sheet quality, and strategic positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely favor FRT over KRG in the current market environment. FRT's combination of record leasing activity, upward earnings revisions, analyst upgrades, and a technology-forward operational strategy provides a more cohesive and lower-risk catalyst profile. While KRG's Sun Belt exposure and portfolio repositioning offer genuine long-term appeal, its recent revenue contraction and earnings volatility introduce uncertainty that an AI-driven probabilistic model would likely discount. The AI verdict does not dismiss KRG's potential — particularly for yield-focused investors comfortable with execution risk — but it recognizes that FRT's steadier fundamental trajectory and institutional-quality characteristics align more consistently with the patterns that AI models tend to reward in current market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FRT vs. KRG commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Hold and KRG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FRT: $118.39 vs. KRG: $26.45)
Brand notoriety: FRT and KRG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 61% vs. KRG: 59%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $10.29B vs. KRG: $5.3B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $10.29B. KRG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $5.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKRG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KRG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the long-term than KRG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KRG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KRG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KRG is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while KRG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

KRG is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.48% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($10.3B) has a higher market cap than KRG($5.3B). FRT has higher P/E ratio than KRG: FRT (23.92) vs KRG (16.53). FRT YTD gains are higher at: 21.168 vs. KRG (14.825). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03B vs. KRG (824M). KRG has more cash in the bank: 145M vs. FRT (107M). KRG has less debt than FRT: KRG (2.84B) vs FRT (4.85B). FRT has higher revenues than KRG: FRT (1.34B) vs KRG (807M).
FRTKRGFRT / KRG
Capitalization10.3B5.3B194%
EBITDA1.03B824M125%
Gain YTD21.16814.825143%
P/E Ratio23.9216.53145%
Revenue1.34B807M165%
Total Cash107M145M74%
Total Debt4.85B2.84B171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs KRG: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
KRG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6857
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6333
SMR RATING
1..100
6168
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4888
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KRG's Valuation (25) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (70). This means that KRG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

KRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (63). This means that KRG’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KRG (68). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KRG’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KRG (52). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KRG’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRG (88). This means that FRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTKRG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOD209.505.99
+2.94%
Modine Manufacturing Co
OACCU11.00N/A
N/A
Oaktree Acquisition Corp III Life Sciences
PRLB91.87-0.45
-0.49%
Proto Labs
ELA16.03-0.15
-0.93%
Envela Corp
INCR0.93-0.01
-1.47%
Intercure Ltd

KRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRG has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KRG jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRG
1D Price
Change %
KRG100%
-0.11%
KIM - KRG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
BRX - KRG
80%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
FRT - KRG
80%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
UE - KRG
77%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
PECO - KRG
75%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
More